โDIE you maggot,โ reads one of the hundreds of emails from climate science deniers that have dropped into philosopher Lawrence Torcelloโs inbox in recent days.
โFortunately, your kind will be marched to the wall with all the other leftist detritus,โ says another.
Others accuse Torcello, an assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technologyโs Department of Philosophy in the west of New York State, of being a fascist, Stalinist and a Nazi.
The catalyst for the bilious outpouring was an article Torcello had written for The Conversation website arguing there was โgood reason to considerโ that โthe funding of climate denialโ was morally and criminally negligent.
โI knew there would be debate in the comment section, which I was welcoming,โ Torcello told me, adding he also knew the โusual climate denialist blogsโ wouldnโt like it too much.
โBut I didnโt expect the wide level of exposure that the misrepresentations would get in the press and I didnโt expect the intense storm of hate mail and Twitter harassment the article experienced.โ
At one point, he says he picked up his phone to be told that soon he would be โpaid a visitโ. One email told Torcello โ in customary all-caps angriness โ that he was a โFAGGOTโ and that global warming was โA LIE STRAIGHT FROM THE JEWSโ.
โWhen I include phone calls and twitter harassment in addition to the emails Iโve received, then somewhere above 700 items of correspondence seems like a good estimate,โ says Torcello.
โI did stop keeping count after the first few days of constant bombardment, but over a week later mail is still coming.โ
Online misrepresentations
More accurately, it seems the catalyst for the hate campaign was not so much the article itself but the way it was misrepresented in conservative media.
Climate science denialist James Delingpole, now writing for the conservative activist website Breitbart, managed to twice misrepresent Torcelloโs article in his very first sentence.
Under the headline โUS Philosophy Professor: Jail โDenialistโ Climate Scientists For Criminal Negligenceโ Delingpole wrote Torcello had argued โscientists who donโt believe in catastrophic man-made global warming should be put in prisonโ.
โThis was a blatant misrepresentation of my article,โ says Torcello, whose article did not mention climate โscientistsโ or say that anyone should be put in the โslammerโ, as Delingpole had claimed. Torcello says:
One crucial aspect of the scientific process is that ideas are tested against rigourous skepticism. Scientists who challenge conventional understandings of climate change in the course of their research are doing exactly what scientists are supposed to do.
Despite Delingpoleโs misrepresentation, things soon got worse. The Daily Callerโs Education Editor Eric Owens wrote that Torcello โwants to send people who disagree with him about global warming to jail.โ
Owens, whose story was reposted by FoxNation, also thought the chilly 18F temperature in Rochester on the day Torcelloโs story was published was in some way relevant.
Conspiracy-friendly Infowars.com went a step further, claiming that Torcello had โcalled for the incarceration of any American who actively disagrees that climate change is solely caused by human activity.โ Traffic-heavy The Drudge Report reposted the Infowars.com story.
Promoting complaints
Lord Christopher Monckton wrote to the provost at Torcelloโs college to encourage them to consider if he was a โfit and proper person to hold any academic post at the Instituteโ.
Lord Moncktonโs outburst seems particularly ironic, given that he once told a partisan Australian crowd of climate sceptics: โSo to the bogus scientists who have produced the bogus science that invented this bogus scare I say, we are coming after you. We are going to prosecute you, and we are going to lock you up.โ
Climate science denialist blogger Anthony Watts promoted Moncktonโs letter and provided his readers with the email addresses of senior university personnel and encouraged complaints. In another post, Watts gave links to Torcelloโs academic home page containing his email address.
โIf you choose to lodge a complaint, be sure to be courteous and factual, we donโt need to surrender the moral high ground to anger,โ wrote Watts.
Despite this apparent plea for civility, several comments were allowed to stand on Wattsโ blog making references to Torcelloโs looks and calling him various names including โbozoโ, โidiotโ and โcrazy lunaticโ. One commenter suggested that someone should โput [Torcelloโs] ass in prisonโ.
Torcello says:
Perhaps this sounds naรฏve in retrospect, but I expected that anyone who had a response to the article I wrote would have read it. One thing that almost all of the calls and emails I know of shared in common was a lack of having read my article.
Now it is clear that the bloggers misrepresenting my views knew exactly what they were doing with the scandalous headlines and crafted misquotations. Even when they linked to my article, they felt secure in the judgement that their audience wouldnโt read it.
Support among the hate
Torcello did receive some supportive emails sent to his bosses. One came from philosopher Brian Leiter, a professor at the University of Chicago and founder of its Center for Law, Philosophy and Human Values. Leiter said:
This kind of organized harassment of faculty by the far right happens too often, and universities should be encouraged to take a stronger stand against this malevolent behavior.
The Rochester Institute of Technology president Bill Destler released a statement saying Torcello had โa right to free speechโ and that universities and colleges should be forums for the discussion of โcontroversial issuesโ.
Another hate campaign
But the treatment meted out to Torcello is just the latest in a long list of attacks on climate scientists and other academics that accept the risk of human-caused climate change and speak publicly on the issue.
Scientists in Australia have similar experiences with bursts of threatening hate mail, not forgetting the hacking of email accounts, regular public vilification by mostly conservative commentators and steady streams of Freedom of Information requests asking for correspondence, raw data or working documents.
Most recently, the journal Frontiers in Psychology withdrew one climate change paper after contrarians made a string of complaints and claimed the research was defamatory towards them. The journal said it had withdrawn the paper even after a โdetailed investigationโ had found no academic or ethical issues with the study.
Torcello told me his experience had taught him a โvitally important lessonโ.
Those of us who write on climate change need to be prepared for just this sort of harassment. Our universities and other organizations need to be prepared to support their employees during such assaults, and they probably need training in how to do that.
Academic journals and the other news outlets have to be prepared to stand with their authors against abuse, and they may need to be urged in that direction.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts