Enbridge Announces $7B Line 3 Rebuild, Largest Project in Company History

authordefault
on

In its largest capital project in history, Enbridge plans to do what Transcanada so far can’t โ€” ship more than half a million barrels of heavy oil across the U.S. border without President Barack Obama’s directย approval.

Lateย Mondayย evening, Enbridge announced plans for its largest capital project in historyโ€” a $7 billion replacement of its Line 3 pipeline.

The existing Line 3 pipeline is part of Enbridgeโ€™s extensive Mainline system. The 34-inch pipe was installed in 1968 and currently carries light oil 1,660 km from Edmonton to Superior,ย Wis.ย 

While the Line 3 pipeline currently has a maximum shipping capacity of 390,000 barrels of light crude oil per day, pumping stations along the line have a much larger capacity (and can accommodate heavier oils). Enbridge plans to take advantage of this. Under the company’s replacement plans, the new Line 3 pipeline will be widened by two inches, and built โ€œusing the latest available high-strength steel and coating technology.โ€ย By the time it goes into service in 2017, Line 3 will ship 760,000 barrels of oil across the border every day, nearly double what it currentlyย moves.ย 

At the same time, the new Line 3 will be designated as โ€˜mixed service,โ€™ allowing it to carry a variety of different types of oil from heavy to light. Speaking on a conference call with investors and media this morning, Enbridge CEO Al Monaco saidย โ€œmy lean would be more towards the heavier side, but it will carryย both.โ€

Line 3 will continue to operate at full current capacity during the construction period. All construction is expected to occur within the existing pipelineย corridor.

Enbridge Liquids Pipeline System

No presidential permit required (because it already hasย one)

Unlike the Keystone XL pipeline or itsย predecessor Line 67ย (also known by its more jovial name โ€˜Alberta Clipperโ€™), this project is classified as โ€œreplacementโ€ or โ€œmaintenance,โ€ meaning it operates under an existing presidential permit and does not require a new one. Enbridge proponents made a point of repeatedly affirming this during Tuesday’s call with investors andย media.ย 

Construction will be managed by two separate companies. Theย Edmonton to Hardisty segment and the Hardisty, Alta., to Gretna, Man., segmentsย will be managed by Enbridgeโ€™s wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. will take responsibility for approvals and construction of theย segment between Neche, N.D., and Superior, Wis.

Notably, both projects omit discussion of the tiny โ€” but crucial โ€” 3 km pipeline segment that crosses the Canada/U.S. border and links Gretna, Man., to Neche, N.D. On theย U.S. webpageย for the Line 3 project, Enbridgeย states:

โ€œSegments of Line 3 from the Canadian border to Neche, N.D., and near the Minnesota/Wisconsin border to the Superior terminal are being replaced under separate segment replacement projects.โ€ย Theย Canadian webpageย has a similar message.

At the moment, it is not clear what those replacement projects are, or what stage of approval they are in. Enbridge did not return a call to clarifyย details.

Two Keystone XL pipelines perย day

With its announcement, the Line 3 replacement joins three other large-scale expansion projects by Enbridge in varying stages of development orย approval.ย 

  • The 525,000 barrels per day Northern Gateway pipelineย connecting Edmonton with Kitimat, B.C., has received a positive recommendation from the National Energy Board and will see a decision from the federal cabinet in the next three months.ย ย 
  • Within the next few weeks, a decision is expected on the proposed reversal of Ontario and Quebecโ€™sย Line 9B pipeline. Currently the pipeline ships oil received via tankers from a Montreal terminal to Sarnia, Ont. If approved, the reversed pipeline would ship 300,000 barrel per dday of Canadian-sourced oil from Sarnia to Montreal for internationalย export.ย 
  • Enbridge has already completed Phase 1 of its planned expansion to theย Alberta Clipper pipeline, increasing its capacity from 450,000ย  to 570,000 barrels per day. On Feb. 10, Canadaโ€™s National Energy Board approved Phase 2 of the pipeline expansion, allowing it to ship at its maximum capacity of 800,000 barrels per dday. Approval of the project on the U.S. side is currently delayed while the State Department updates its environmentalย regulations.ย 
  • Applications for theย Line 3 replacement projectย will be filed in lateย 2014.

Should all four of these projects go ahead, they will collectively increase Enbridgeโ€™s daily shipping volume by approximately 1.5 million barrels per day, or the equivalent of nearly two Keystone XL pipelines. The Keystone XL pipeline is expected to transport 830,000ย bpd.

Addendum: Here’s the math behind the projected Enbridge shippingย volume.ย 

CURRENT SHIPPING VOLUMES: (Barrels Perย Day)

  • Line 9: 0 (its current 240,000 barrel per day capacity does not include Canadian-sourced oil, and flows in the oppositeย direction)
  • Northern Gateway:ย 0
  • Line 3:ย 390,000
  • Alberta Clipper:ย 450,000
  • TOTAL: 840,000 barrels perย day

FUTURE SHIPPING VOLUMES (BPD):

  • Line 9:ย 300,000
  • Northern Gateway:ย 525,000
  • Line 3:ย 760,000
  • Alberta Clipper:ย 800,000
  • TOTAL: 2, 385,000 barrels perย day

For a difference of 1,545,000 barrels per day or the equivalent of 1.86 Keystone XLs.

Image Credit: Mack Male viaย Flickr

Related Posts

on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.