US Court: Transcanada's Keystone XL Profits More Important than Environment

picture-7018-1583982147.png
on

In a major ruling that’s flown under the radar, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit – based in Denver, Colorado – decided not to grant the Sierra Club and Clean Energy Future Oklahoma a temporary injunction on the construction of theย southern half ofย Transcanada’s Keystone XL tar sands export pipeline.ย 

The Court’s decision hinged on an โ€œinjuryโ€ balancing test: Would Transcanada be hurt more financially fromย receiving an injunction? Had it lost, it would be stuck with one until Sierra Club, et al receive a U.S. District Court decision on the legality of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ decision to grant Transcanada a Nationwide Permit 12 (NWP 12) for construction of what’s now called the Gulf Coast Pipeline in Februaryย 2012.ย 

Or would ecosystems suffer even greater and potentially incalculable damage from the 485-mile, 700,000 barrels per dayย pipeline crossing 2,227ย streams?

In a 2-1 decision, the Court sided with Transcanada, and by extension, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Court ruled, โ€œthe threatened environmental injuries were outweighed by the financial harm that the injunction would causeย Transcanada.โ€

Commenting on the case brought by Sierra Club, et al, Judge Jerome A. Holmes andย Judge Paul J. Kelly, Jr. – appointees of President George W. Bush and President George H.W. Bush, respectively –ย shot down the argumentsย sharply.

U.S. Appeals Court for the 10th Circuit Judgeย Jerome A. Holmes; Photo Credit: The Whiteย House

Holmes and Kelly ruled thatย Sierra Club, et al failed to show how the pipeline will have a significant environmental impact despite the fact it’s been deemed a โ€œfuse to the biggest carbon bomb on the planetโ€ by retired NASA climate scientist Jamesย Hansen.ย 

Construction of Keystone XL‘s southern half – subject of significant grassroots activism by the Tar Sands Blockadeย and others – is now nearly complete. Tar sands dilbit is slated to begin to flow through it in earlyย 2014.ย 

NWP 12: โ€œNew Normalโ€ for Tar Sands Pipelineย Approval

After protestors succeeded initially in delaying Keystone XL, Big Oil has chosen a โ€œnew normalโ€ stealth approval method: the non-transparent NWPย 12.ย 

This avoids the more strenuous National Environmental Protection Act permitting process overseen by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which requires public hearings and public comments for major federal pipeline projects. NEPA compels the EPA to take comments into account in response throughout the Environmental Impact Statement phase, allowing robust public participation in theย process.

Sierra Club Staff Attorney Doug Hayes explained in an interview with DeSmogBlog that NWP 12ย is for utility projects with up to a half an acre of stream or wetland impacts, and has never been used for tar sands pipelines before Keystone XL‘s southernย half.

The southern half of the pipeline was approved viaย Executive Order by President Barack Obama in March 2012, directly after Obama gave a speech in front of a Cushing, OK pipeyard.

President Barack Obama speaks in Cushing, OK in March 2013; Photo Credit: Whiteย House

โ€œThe Corps is abusing the nationwide permit program. Nationwide permits were intended to permit categories of projects with truly minimal impacts, not tar sands oil pipelines crossing several states,โ€ saidย Hayes.ย 

Utilizing tricky legal loopholes, Transcanada used NWP 12 to push through Keystone XL‘s southern half in February 2012, calling each half acre segment of Keystone XL‘s southern half a โ€œsingle and complete project.โ€ The Army Corps of Engineers agreed despite the fact that Transcanada refers to the pipeline at-large as the โ€œGulf Coast Pipelineย project.โ€

โ€œWhat the Corps is doing is artificially dividing up these massive pipelines, treating them as thousands of individual projects to avoid environmental review,โ€ Hayes explained. โ€œIn this case, there were 2,227 crossings of federal waterways, so the Corps has treated the Gulf Coast Pipeline as 2,227 ‘single and complete projects,’ each of which qualifies under NWPย 12.โ€

Sierra Club Staff Attorney Doug Hayes; Photo Credit: Sierraย Club

Why, I askedย Hayes?ย 

โ€œThe Corps artificially treats these massive pipelines as thousands of individual projects so as to qualify under NWP 12 and avoid NEPAย compliance.โ€

NWP 12 has also been utilizedย by Enbridge for theย Flanagan South Pipeline, a 600-mile, 600,000 barrels per day pipeline set to shuttle tar sands crude from Flanagan, IL to Cushing, OK, crossing over 2,000 streams. That pipeline is scheduled to begin operations in mid-2014, demonstrating how NWP 12 is the โ€œnew normalโ€ way to fast-track domestic tar sandsย pipelines.ย 

Dissent: Laws Violated, Economic Harm Transcanada’sย Fault

Perhaps the biggest irony of the Appeals Court decision is that Judges Holmes and Kelly barely grappled with the central issue of the legal challenge to begin with: using NWP 12 rather than going through the NEPAย process.ย 

โ€œThe majority opinion avoided addressing the legal questions that are central to this lawsuit – whether the Corps violated the law in permitting this pipeline – and instead it was based on how much money a delay in construction would cost TransCanada,โ€ saidย Hayes.ย 

Though Judges Holmes and Kelly stayed mum about these issues, dissenting U.S. District Court for the District of Coloradoย Judge Williamย Martรญnez – an Obama appointee – did not, pulling no punches in doingย so.ย 

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado Judgeย William Martรญnez; Photo Credit: Judgepedia

โ€œGiven the totality of the circumstancesโ€ฆI believe theโ€ฆGulf Coast Pipeline required a comprehensive NEPA analysis,โ€ Martรญnezย wrote.

โ€œThere are also no specific findings in support of the Corps’ conclusion that the Gulf Coast Pipeline, as a whole, would have minimal cumulative impact. The failure to consider the cumulative effects of all of the water crossings involved in the Gulf Coast Pipeline violates the terms of NWP 12, and, therefore, the approval of the use of NWP 12 for construction of the Gulf Coast Pipeline violated theย law.โ€ย 

Though Judgesย Holmes and Kelly grappled with the issue of water crossings – belittling the amount of water Keystone XL‘s southern half would cross over –ย Martรญnez said it’s about much more than justย water.ย 

There is โ€œreal and signifcant harm caused by the actual construction of the pipeline, including the clearing of trees and vegetation, removing topsoil, filling wetlands, building access roads, and clearing an eighty-five foot construction right-of-way for the length of the pipeline,โ€ heย stated.

Hayes agreed with this assessment, pointing to examples of things the Judges simply ignored in theirย assessment.ย 

โ€œ[T]he court’s balancing test ignored the host of environmental impacts associated with this pipeline, including the risks of tar sands oil spills,โ€ saidย Hayes.

โ€œRemember that the 2010 tar sands pipeline spill in Michigan is still being cleaned up, and so far has cost over a billion dollars.ย It’s a bit of a Catch-22 to say that this is all just about a few acres of wetlands loss, when the whole point of this lawsuit is that the Corps avoided analyzing any of the pipeline’s environmental impacts as required by NEPA.โ€

Lastly,ย Martรญnez put the onus on Transcanada for its economicย decision-making.

โ€œTranscanada chose to incur its economic harm by entering into contracts for services before the Gulf Coast Pipeline was approved, even in light of the controversial nature of the Pipeline,โ€ saidย Martรญnez (emphasisย his).

U.S. District Court Decision Forthcoming, Activismย Persistsย 

Sierra Club, et al now await a summary judgment from the U.S. District Court for the District of Coloradoย on whether Keystone XL failed the dictates of NEPA. It’s a key decision, Hayes says, because โ€œa ruling in our favor could prevent the Corps from doing this in theย future.โ€

While they await this lower court judgment, activists continue efforts to fend off these pipelineย projects.ย 

โ€œThis decision yet again demonstrates why direct action is necessary. The permitting process for Keystone XL‘s southern leg was illegal, yet regulators, inspectors, Obama, and the courts are failing to do what is necessary to protect the people and ecosystems threatened by this toxic pipeline,โ€ said Ron Seifert, aย Tar Sands Blockadeย spokesman.ย 

โ€œIf all the branches of government are so helplessly captured by industry that they will do nothing to stave off climate change, then the people must rise up and take the defense of the environment into their ownย hands.โ€

Photo Credit: tankist276ย | ShutterStock

picture-7018-1583982147.png
Steve Horn is the owner of the consultancy Horn Communications & Research Services, which provides public relations, content writing, and investigative research work products to a wide range of nonprofit and for-profit clients across the world. He is an investigative reporter on the climate beat for over a decade and former Research Fellow for DeSmog.

Related Posts

on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.
on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.