Marking Up the Alberta Government's $30,000 Keystone XL Ad

authordefault
onMar 24, 2013 @ 07:48 PDT

This is a guest post by Heather Libby.

If you’re a regular reader of the Sunday New York Times, you might have noticed a half-page ad in the A section promoting the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline last weekend. Paid for by the Alberta government with $30,000 of taxpayer funds, the text-heavy ad asserted several reasons why President Obama should approve the project.

Their primary argument? This is โ€œthe choice ofย reasonโ€.

Putting aside the fact that their word selection suggests those who oppose the pipeline are illogicalย or unreasonable; the ad says โ€œsome still argue Keystone should be decided on emotion rather than science and fact about Canada’s responsibly developed oil sandsย resourceโ€.

We completely agree. Here are a few scientific facts it forgot toย mention:

And the list goes on, full of reasonable concerns that the Alberta government would rather you not ponder.

Check out our copy of the ad below (click to embiggen) to see a few more suggested edits to Alberta’s assertions.ย 

authordefault

Related Posts

onNov 20, 2025 @ 16:02 PST

Trade groups lobbied ministers to promote a source of energy linked to massive environmental harms at the U.N. climate conference.

Trade groups lobbied ministers to promote a source of energy linked to massive environmental harms at the U.N. climate conference.
Analysis

Agribusiness companies generate huge quantities of greenhouse gas pollution โ€” and PR companies help them obscure it.

Agribusiness companies generate huge quantities of greenhouse gas pollution โ€” and PR companies help them obscure it.
onNov 19, 2025 @ 11:10 PST

Students from around the world attended the lobby groupโ€™s carbon capture curriculum at the University of Regina in July.

Students from around the world attended the lobby groupโ€™s carbon capture curriculum at the University of Regina in July.
onNov 19, 2025 @ 07:43 PST

Several senior staff members have gained entry without disclosing their real employer.

Several senior staff members have gained entry without disclosing their real employer.