TEA Party: Tobacco Everywhere Always

authordefault
on

Climate change doubt is a key belief in the TEA Party, sparked by the Koch-related Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks. Big Tobacco was heavily involved from the 1980s onward, and by 1992 the โ€œTea Partyโ€ was already in play. Extensive new research has unearthed the real history. 

โ€œโ€˜To quarterback behind the scenes, third-party effortsโ€™: the tobacco industry and the Tea Partyโ€ by Amanda Fallin, Rachel Grana and Stanton A Glantz, was published online last week in BMJ Tobacco Control, a high-impact peer-reviewed journal. They write:

โ€œRather than being a purely grassroots movement that spontaneously developed in 2009, the Tea Party has developed over time, in part through decades of work by the tobacco industry and other corporate interests.โ€

โ€œStarting in the 1980s, tobacco companies worked to create the appearance of broad opposition to tobacco control policies by attempting to create a grassroots smokersโ€™ rights movement. Simultaneously, they funded and worked through third-party groups, such as Citizens for a Sound Economy, the predecessor of AFP and FreedomWorks, to accomplish their economic and political agenda. There has been continuity of some key players, strategies and messages from these groups to Tea Party organisations. As of 2012, the Tea Party was beginning to spread internationally.โ€

Watch the 19 minute video from Friday, starting at 01:17:45: โ€œQuarterbacking Behind the Scenesโ€ The Tobacco Industry and the Tea Party,โ€ read the blog by Glantz, then buy the paper for the extensive backup detail.*  Itโ€™s worth it, but the paper is now free.  Their title came from a 1995 Philip Morris strategy memo  by Beverly McKittrick:

โ€˜A. Long-term โ€“ To create political environment where โ€œmoderatesโ€ of both parties can vote for legislation that divests FDA of any power to regulate tobacco because they are convinced that FDA is already failing miserably in accomplishing its โ€œcore mission.โ€

B. Short-term โ€“ To quarterback behind the scenes, third-party efforts to launch, publicize and execute a broad non-tobacco-based attack on the many failings of the FDA with respect to its currently authorized statutory activities.

II. THIRDโ€“PARTY GROUPS

A. Citizens for a Sound Economy โ€“ Monitor and help direct multi-front action plan.

B. Washington Legal Foundation โ€“ Monitor and help direct multi-front action plan

C. Competitive Enterprise Institute โ€“ Work with Borelli to help tie their activities more into congressional efforts re timing, focus, and venuesโ€ฆ.โ€™

CEIโ€˜s well-known efforts in climate anti-science feature Myron Ebell, Chris Horner, their Cooler Heads Coalition, and their role in recruiting Ross McKitrick, Christopher Essex and Steve McIntyre in the attack on the hockey-stick temperature curve, but CEI had a long involvement with tobacco:

โ€œOn behalf of everyone here at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, I would like to thank you for Philip Morrisโ€™s $150,000 contribution. โ€ฆ Fred L. Smith, Jr, Presidentโ€

However, CSE was tobaccoโ€™s favorite, taking at least $5.3M 1991-2002. It was founded in 1984 by David Koch and his key lieutenant, Richard Fink, ex-economics professor at George Mason University (GMU), home of the Mercatus Center, the Institute for Humane Studies and law school that graduated Ken Cuccinelli and other relevant lawyers.   CSE Exec VP and first AFP President Nancy Mitchell Pfotenhauer was a GMU student, major Koch lobbyist for years,  and lately Vice-Rector of GMU (A.5, A.6). CSE later reorganized into TEA Party sparkplugs Americans For Prosperity and FreedomWorks.

The tobacco/climate anti-science relationship was highlighted in Merchants of Doubt and  has been noted by others.  Tobacco interests created many of the tactics and fostered the machinery inherited by other anti-science efforts. Here at DeSMogBlog Fakery 2: More Funny Finances, Free oF Tax, Appendix F, showed the crucial problem for tobacco companies. As per RJ Reynoldsโ€™ The Importance of Younger Adults,  they needed to addict children to create lifelong customers, not adults.  Few start smoking after age 18, and later starters find it easier to quit, because addiction really is best entrenched while brains are still developing.

Higher cigarette taxes especially deter children from smoking, so they pose an existential threat to tobacco companies, to be fought at all costs, but hidden  among larger groups.  As Fallin, Grana and Glantz wrote,

โ€œIn 1990, Tim Hyde, RJR director of national field operations, outlined a strategy for RJR to create โ€˜a movementโ€™ resembling what would later emerge as the Tea Party by

โ€˜build[ing] broad coalitions around the issue-cluster of freedom, choice and privacyโ€ฆโ€™

Another RJR field coordinator later described the companyโ€™s motivation for involving and organising third-party organisations:

โ€˜โ€ฆโ€”anti-tax groups were a natural. You didnโ€™t have to defend your position on tobacco because a tax is a tax is a tax to these guys.โ€™โ€

The authors found an even more specific Burson-Marsteller proposal from 1992:

โ€œGrounded in the theme of โ€œThe New American Tax Revolutionโ€ or The New Boston Tea Party,โ€ the campaign activity should take the form of citizens representing the widest constituency base mobilized with signage and other attention-drawing accoutrements such as lapel buttons, handouts, petitions and even costumes.โ€

It took decades, but they got that, including the costumes. Iโ€™d guess few members of the TEA Party realize it was created to help the tobacco industry addict kids to behavior that will kill many, slowly. For a definitive history of tobacco industry malfeasance, there is no better source than Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition (2012).

Side-by-side with Kochs,  expanding abroad, TEA = Tobacco Everywhere Always.

See also Brendanโ€™s take on this, Study Confirms Tea Party Was Created by Big Tobacco and Billionaires.

* This article has 184 footnotes with references to many more details, plus another 16 pages of dense supplementary material listing organizations, people, funding, campaign examples, with its own 161 footnotes.  In my opinion, it is an investigative tour de force, costs $30 and is worth every penny.

UPDATE 02/22/13: paper is now freely available.
Update 07/10/16: tweak wording to clarify link to free paper.

Image credit: R. Gino Santa Maria / Shutterstock.com

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Opinion
on

The 2025 World Ski Championships in Trondheim are an opportunity for the country to choose a cleaner path.

The 2025 World Ski Championships in Trondheim are an opportunity for the country to choose a cleaner path.
on

An official complaint slams MCC Brussels for failing to declare its funding, and warns that European democracy is under โ€œsevere attackโ€.

An official complaint slams MCC Brussels for failing to declare its funding, and warns that European democracy is under โ€œsevere attackโ€.
Analysis
on

The American refiner pitched a pivot away from Alberta suppliers ahead of President Trumpโ€™s trade war salvo.

The American refiner pitched a pivot away from Alberta suppliers ahead of President Trumpโ€™s trade war salvo.
Opinion
on

The first step is to listen and acknowledge that people of all political stripes are feeling confused, overwhelmed, angry, and scared.

The first step is to listen and acknowledge that people of all political stripes are feeling confused, overwhelmed, angry, and scared.