Oil and Gas Industry Set to Attack Matt Damon's "Promised Land"

1-DSC09675
on

Next month Focus Features releases Matt Damonโ€™s new movie and the oil and gas industry is worried sick aboutย it.

The movie, Promised Land, is about a Pennsylvania farm town deciding whether to go forward with shale gas drilling after a team of landmen arrives in theย area.

Damon plays one of these landman, who rolls into town presenting himself as a humble flannel-wearing farmboy from Iowa. Damonโ€™s character is an ace salesman, famously good at convincing homeowners to sign away the rights to their land. But halfway through the story, he starts having ethical pangs about his profession. Damonโ€™s internal conflicts grow deeper as he grows closer toย locals.

By Hollywood standards, itโ€™s a small film, with a budget of $15 million. The script was written by Damon and co-star John Krasinski (best known for his role as Jim in โ€œThe Officeโ€) and is based on a story by Daveย Eggers.

The drilling industry is none too pleased about the movieโ€™s at-times unflattering portrayal of landmen and it has already geared up its attack machine to aggressivelyย respond.

The irony here, of course, is that the industryโ€™s plan for taking on the movie runs parallel at times to the movie itself.ย  It a case where art imitates life imitatesย art.

I will come back to this.ย  But first, meet Mikeย Knapp.

You can find Mike pretty easily on the internet. He presents himself as an average dude. On his twitter feed he talks about his favorite beers. He sends out instagram shots of snowfall on a barn and pickup truck. He bemoans the passage of time and aging when his drivers license expires. And heโ€™s a solid citizen. โ€œJust loaded up a car full of groceries from our small local market!โ€ he tweeted lastย month.

Mike is not happy about Promisedย Land.

On his blog, he writes indignantly about detractors of shale gas, attacking critics of Pennsylvania drilling and laying out lengthy arguments in favor of theย industry.

Of course, Mike Knapp isnโ€™t just another Pennsylvanian, despite his โ€œAverage Joeโ€ presentation.

Mike is a landman, a participant in the Marcellus shale rush. And he also works for Energy in Depth, the fracking industryโ€™s most vocal front group. Like Damonโ€™s landman character, Mike doesnโ€™t conceal his connections to the industry. But like Damonโ€™s character, Mike Knapp tries to present himself as simply working for the best interests of his neighbors when in fact he works for the drilling industry, pure andย simple.

Even though he hasnโ€™t seen it, Mike rails online against the Damonย movie.

โ€œFlaming farms?ย  Pasture fields turning brown? Livestock becoming sick and dying?ย  This is what we were afraid of,โ€ wrote Mr. Knapp in a September 26 blog post. โ€œWe weren’t expecting a 100% accurate representation of the drilling process, but COME ON!โ€

DeSmog was given an exclusive chance to view the movie before its release and it is quite clear that Promised Land is not an environmental-scare flick. In fact, itโ€™s not even anti-fracking, per se. Instead, the movie takes a close look at the economic realities that drive people to lease their land, the dying prospects for family farms, and remains vague about frackingโ€™s environmentalย impacts.

Although the film is far from flattering to the industry, it hardly presents the issues in black and white. Matt Damonโ€™s depiction of a landman is humanizing. Damon’s fellow leasing agent, played by Frances McDormand, is a pragmatist, a mother looking to support herย family.

All this begs a simple question: is it really the portrayal of slick landmen that scares the drilling industry? Or is there something else that worries them evenย more?

The answer to this question comes about 20 minutes into theย film.

Half the town has gathered in the local gymnasium to discuss drilling and hear from the landmen about its benefits. But the high school science teacherย objects.

โ€œI would encourage all of you to go home and Google this word [fracking] and see what you find. Unfortunately, itโ€™s not nearly as simple as what Supervisor Richards just laid out,โ€ he says. โ€œNow, listen, itโ€™s true there is some money to be made having this industry coming in, but can we at least not pretend that it is not withoutย cost?โ€

The town decides to hold a vote on whether or not to allow drilling to move forward, setting up the main battle of theย film.

This is the part that is so frightening to oil and gas companies โ€“ the simple fact that there is a vote at all. It conjures up a possibility that the industry cannot tolerate: localย control.

For most oil and gas companies, a depiction of landmen as willing to peddle in half-truths and play on locals’ sense of desperation no longer represents much of a threat. The recent land rush for drilling rights in shale areas has, in many of the most promising areas, already passed. So the industry is less dependent on these salespeople than it was four or five yearsย ago.

Local control, on the other hand, remains a very real possibility. And if local governments individually hold the reins on fracking in their area, the drilling industry will face a new battle in each town and may need to make concessions in order to win support โ€“ if it wins atย all.

Lease rates may be openly discussed instead of privately negotiated. Environmental risks might be openly weighed and assessed by those who will actually bear their brunt. Potential economic benefits could be more carefully reviewed in towns and cities atop theย shales.

Across the U.S., dozens of cities and towns have already passed local bans or moratoria. And courts have so far upheld the right of many communities to control if and how fracking is conducted in theirย locale.

This is the true nightmare for an industry long-accustomed to getting its way with state-level legislators andย regulators.

With this specter in mind, the likes of Mr. Knapp and the industry he represents are already in high gear. Their goal is to frame the film as heavy-handed and anti-fracking. Their pitch is that Hollywood Elites just canโ€™t understand Averageย Americans.

The industry has also already leaked the movieโ€™s script online, in the hope of stealing some of its dramatic thunder by revealing plot twists. The Independent Petroleum Association of America has said it plans to set up โ€œfact-checkโ€ websites and to distribute pro-fracking material to moviegoers and filmย critics.

Others plan a more playful approach. โ€œWeโ€™re ready,โ€ Chris Tucker, a long-time spokesperson for Energy in Depth told gathered executives at an industry conference lastย month.

โ€œItโ€™s not a Gasland thing, where youโ€™re gonna put together a 6,000 word rebuttal. Thereโ€™s no sort of rebuttal to a Hollywood fictional film โ€“ you donโ€™t want to be silly about it,โ€ he said, describing โ€œhilariousโ€ plans to arrange visits by celebrities and the entertainment press to drillingย sites.

Shell plans to use the filmโ€™s publicity to bring attention to their advertisements-cum-cinema, โ€œThe Rational Middle,โ€ their PR workers haveย said.

Others in the industry are looking to use Promised Landโ€™s prominence as a way to draw viewers for their pet films: Truthland and Frack Nation. The director of one of those movies has already been writing op-eds trying to drum upย attention.

โ€œItโ€™s a misrepresentation of life in rural America and a misrepresentation of the hearts and minds of these citizens,โ€ Phelim McAleer, director of Frack Nation said in a statement about Promisedย Land.

Like landmen arriving in rural farmhouses with sales tags still tacked to their flannel shirts, these overblown claims and the rest of industry’s spin about the movie are virtually parodies of themselves. They represent opinions from people who are paid to hold them, because they support their customerโ€™s broader policyย goals.

Despite the industry’s faux-outrage and attempts to stir up hype, the Damon movie is not anti-fracking or a propaganda piece. The film offers up a clear-eyed look at economic hardships faced in many ruralย communities.

It also makes a simple point: with so much at stake, shouldn’t communities have a candid, informed discussion about the risks and benefits of oil and gasย drilling?

1-DSC09675
Sharon Kelly is an attorney and investigative reporter based in Pennsylvania. She was previously a senior correspondent at The Capitol Forum and, prior to that, she reported for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Nation, Earth Island Journal, and a variety of other print and online publications.

Related Posts

on

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies
on

The worldโ€™s largest advertising and public relations firms continue to get the majority of their work from major polluters, a new report has found. Known as the โ€œBig Six,โ€ WPP, Omnicom, Interpu...
on

Unique collaboration convenes leaders from the global climate and trauma healing movements to explore the neglected inner dimensions of the crisis.

Unique collaboration convenes leaders from the global climate and trauma healing movements to explore the neglected inner dimensions of the crisis.
Analysis
on

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.