Fox News Viewers are the Most Misinformed: A Seventh Study Arrives to Prove It (and to Vindicate Jon Stewart!)

authordefault
on

Two of my most popular posts here at DeSmogBlog were a pair of items documenting 1) just how many surveys have found Fox News viewers to be more misinformed about factual reality and 2) taking PolitiFact to task for giving Jon Stewart a โ€œfalseโ€ rating when he pointed thisย out.

Stewart wasnโ€™t wrong, PolitiFactย was.

In these pieces, I identified 6 separate studies showing Fox News viewers to be the most misinformed, and in a right wing directionโ€“studies on global warming, health care, health care a second time, the Ground Zero mosque, the Iraq war, and the 2010 election.

I also asked if anyone was aware of any counterevidence, and none was forthcoming. There might very well be a survey out there showing that Fox viewers aren’tย the most misinformed cable news consumers on some topic (presumably it would be a topic where Democrats have some sort of ideological blind spot), but I havenโ€™t seen it. And I haveย looked.

There really does seem to be a โ€œFox News effect,โ€ then, and one that is playing a central role in driving our political divide over reality in the U.S. And now comes a true tour-de-force seventh study showing that Fox News viewers are the most misinformed, this time once again about globalย warming.

The new paper, already flagged here by Farron Cousins, is just out in the International Journal of Press/Politics, by communication scholar Lauren Feldman of American University and her colleagues. The paper is quite sophisticated, and performs several powerful analyses. But for our purposes, hereโ€™s whatย matters.

Feldman and her colleagues reported on their analysis of a 2008 national survey, which found that โ€œFox News viewing manifests a significant, negative association with global warming acceptance.โ€ Viewers of the station were less likely to agree that โ€œmost scientists think global warming is happeningโ€ and less likely to think global warming is mostly caused by human activities, among other measures. Viewers of CNN and MSNBC were theย opposite.

And no wonder: Through a content analysis of Fox coverage in 2007 and 2008, Feldman and her colleagues also demonstrated that Fox coverage is more dismissive about climate science, and features more climate skeptics. That’s no shocker, but the paper does a very good job of linking up the coverage itself with the reality denial that results in Foxย viewers.

There is also a fascinating finding that those Republicans who do watch CNN/MSNBC are more persuaded than Democratic viewers are to accept global warming. In other words, Republicans in the study seem much more easily swayed by media framing than Democrats. Put them in the Fox information stream, just add water, and watch denialism sprout. Put them in another information stream, though, and something very different mightย happen.

I noted in my prior posts that the studies documenting the โ€œFox News effectโ€ do not necessarily show causation. In other words, watching Fox may make you more misinformed, but people who believe lots of political misinformation may also gravitate towardsย Fox.

I actually think both things are going on simultaneouslyโ€“but the new Feldman study doesย make a strong causal case that Fox is actively driving a lot of theย problem.

In other words, why are Americans so divided today over reality and what is factually true? There are surely many causesโ€”but one is that a news network with a powerful sway is constantly sowing right wing misinformation, and an army of followers are watching and believingย it.

Related Posts

on

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.
on

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.