Why Communicating Science is So Money

authordefault
on

Iโ€™ve been meaning to thrown in my congratulations to Gavin Schmidt of NASA and RealClimate.org, who is the first recipient of the American Geophysical Unionโ€™s new $ 25,000 annual prize for the yearโ€™s top climate scienceย communicator.

Yes, you read that right, $ 25,000! (Full disclosure: I am on the board of directors of the American Geophysical Union, but I did not select Schmidt for the prize or have fore-knowledge of his selection; nor was I involved in the creation of the prize, which is funded by Natureโ€™sย Own.)

Schmidt is a very worthy choiceโ€”RealClimate.org has revolutionized climate science communication online since its inception in the mid-2000s. And Schmidt has built from that platform to become a major commentator, and a lucid one at that, on outlets like CNN.

But at least as newsy as Schmidtโ€™s choice is the creation of this prize in the firstย place.

I can think of no greater signal that scientific organizations are placing a new value on communication, and a premium value at that. The AGU/Nature’s Own prize is highly symbolic of changes that are occurring throughout the scientific community today, across disciplines and institutions, as communication and outreach are increasingly looked upon not as second fiddle to research, but as a necessary complement and coreย priority.

Itโ€™s not just climate science communicators, by the wayโ€”though they have, of necessity, been on theย forefront.

But consider the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA), for whom I just delivered a plenary address in San Antonioย yesterday.

When I arrived, SSSA leadership introduced me to their new public information campaign to spread the word about how the study of soils benefits society. Theyโ€™ve put out three powerful and well produced videos that emphasize how this research pays off in terms of human health, clean water, and food security. (Watch them here, here, and here.)

As I think youโ€™ll see when you watch these spectacular videos, this is high level stuff, and I hope it gets a very broad airing. And just as AGUโ€™s $ 25,000 prize shows the value placed on science communication by that leading geosciences society, so the Soil Societyโ€™s new ad campaign demonstrates the premium it places on communication andย outreach.

Iโ€™ve explained before why this is happening nowโ€”why scientists are awakening to the need to communicate. Itโ€™s a combination of frustration and necessity: Even as much of America continues to ignore or even attack scientific knowledge, the mediaโ€”which never did such a a great job covering science in the first placeโ€”are now fleeing science coverage across theย board.

Scientists now recognize that if they donโ€™t step up, nobodyย will.

That awareness has been building for some time. But there was always a critical need for it to be accompanied by institutional incentives to reward those scientists who do excel at communicatingโ€“and structural changes in academia and at funding agencies that show similar priorities. And now, weโ€™re observing those changes asย well.

For science communication, it’s a brand newย day.

Related Posts

on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.
on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.