Breaking: State Department Calls Keystone XL Environmental Impact "Limited," Ignoring Evidence

authordefault
on

The State Department just released their Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline. The 27-page document does not flag any significant environmental concerns. The EIS suggests that construction of the pipeline as proposed is preferable to alternatives considered, including: not building the pipeline, rerouting the proposed location, and transporting the oil through alternative means.

In typical agency beurocratic-speak, the main alternatives are described as such:

  • No Action Alternative โ€“ potential scenarios that could occur if the proposed Project is not built and operated;
  • System Alternatives โˆ’ the use of other pipeline systems or other methods of providing Canadian crude oil to the Cushing tank farm and the Gulf Coast market;
  • Major Route Alternatives โˆ’ other potential pipeline routes for transporting heavy crude oil from the U.S./Canada border to Cushing, Oklahoma and the Gulf Coast market.

None of the alternatives were considered by the State Department to be preferable to proposed construction.

The Department will have to conduct another assessment of whether the pipeline is in the โ€œnational interestโ€, as well as a 90-day public comment period, but the public hearings scheduled for the fall are unlikely to change the positive decision. Thus todayโ€™s State Department report is widely considered the final say on approval. The only recourse now is President Obamaโ€™s power to overrule that approval. People are now watching Obamaโ€™s biggest test on climate and the environment before 2012 with bated breath.

TransCanada has already begun planning to start construction on the pipeline as early as 2012, and for a pipeline that TransCanadaโ€™s President for Energy and Oil Pipelines Alexander J. Pourbaix calls โ€œthe safest oil pipeline built in the U.Sโ€, there are a lot of reasons to believe otherwise.

The State Department Environmental Assessment of the already-constructed Keystone I pipeline predicted a maximum of 1 spill approximately every 7 years. Similarly, TransCanadaโ€™s projections suggest 11 significant spills over Keystone XLโ€™s pipelineโ€™s 50 year operational lifetime.
Transcanadaโ€™s Keystone I pipeline has already sprung 12 leaks in the past year alone, spilling nearly 30,000 gallons of bitumen crude. In May, EPA forced TransCanada to shut down the pipeline for several days until it met increased safety standards. Then, in June, the Pipelines and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) issued a Corrective Action Order, stopping use of the pipeline until safety problems had been corrected.

Independent analysis performed by University of Nebraska professor Dr. John Stansbury argues that TransCanadaโ€™s used faulty information to calculate safety assessments for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline.
  • The โ€œKeystone XL Worst-Case Spills Studyโ€ found that rather than 11 significant spills, a more realistic assessment is 91 significant spills over the pipelineโ€™s operational lifetime
  • Stansbury alleges that TransCanada ignored historical data that represents 23 percent of historical pipeline spills, and made the assumption that its pipeline would only half as many spills as other pipelines. 
  • According to Stansburyโ€™s report, TransCanadaโ€™s calculations use a 19-minute shut down time, but the company assumes that it will only take 11 minutes and 30 seconds to shut down the pipeline. Stansbury shows that a โ€œresponse to a leak at a river crossing could conservatively take more than ten times longerโ€ than TransCanada estimates. 

These inadequate estimations mean that worst-case spill volumes will likely be significantly larger than those estimated by TransCanada.

Finally, in the Supplemental Draft EIS (not the report issued today, which we are still reviewing), Keystone XL is expected to leak due to flooding and washout only once every 87,800 years. After Julyโ€™s ExxonMobil Yellowstone spill, it seems outrageous to claim that flooding and washout will claim a pipeline once every 90,000 years. With climate change, there will be increased rainfall and extreme weather, and current models of erosion prediction will be inaccurate.


The Supplemental Draft EIS also expects one incident due to corrosion every 3,400 yearsTransCanada failed to take into account that tar sands pipelines are operated at higher temperatures and pressures, and that, because of its chemical makeup, it is well known that bitumen is more acidic than the conventional crude and more corrosive, with more abrasive agents in it. 

TransCanadaโ€™s track record with Keystone I is poor, and it seems foolhardy to trust them with the drinking water for two million people, the health of hundreds of communities, and for numerous ecologically vulnerable regions.

As Amy Goodman writes, in architecture, a โ€œkeystoneโ€ is the stone at the top of an arch that holds it together. With it, the structure is strong, but without, the structure collapses. To our โ€œkeystoneโ€: Obama, weโ€™re waiting with breathless anticipation. 
authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The former Canadian prime minister with close ties to current Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre was attending an energy panel in New Delhi, India.

The former Canadian prime minister with close ties to current Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre was attending an energy panel in New Delhi, India.
on

After donating heavily to Trumpโ€™s reelection, Big Oil is just catching on that the president's policies can hurt them too, anonymous survey of industry executives reveals.

After donating heavily to Trumpโ€™s reelection, Big Oil is just catching on that the president's policies can hurt them too, anonymous survey of industry executives reveals.
on

The UK media baron trebled his shareholding in Tesla, while his outlets pumped out pro-Musk content.

The UK media baron trebled his shareholding in Tesla, while his outlets pumped out pro-Musk content.
on

Importing fracked gas during a trade war undermines Canadaโ€™s energy security, environmentalists warn premier.

Importing fracked gas during a trade war undermines Canadaโ€™s energy security, environmentalists warn premier.