WUWT: Just Enough Information to Mislead

authordefault
on

You can’t beat Anthony Watts‘ team at WUWT (either Watts Up With That or We Use Wishful Thinking, it’s hard to tell) for the delicate selection and presentation of โ€œevidenceโ€ to argue that climate isn’tย changing.

Here, for example, is a post that trumpets a Nature article on the climate effects of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. WUWT also credits the reputable German publication Der Spiegel as an intermediate source for this information and then posts the graph (left) as easy visual proof that what’s happening in climate today is all part of a normal up andย down.

But have a close look at that graph. First, it doesn’t come from the Nature paper or from Der Spiegel. It was cobbled together on a denier site run by an engineer named Alan Cheetham.ย  Second, the yellow lines showing a downward resumption on the right side are based on – well, actually, on no data points whatever. While Cheetham may have a crystal ball, a touching optimism or a cavalier disregard for objective presentation, he has no evidence atย all.

But he has a fan in Anthony Watts. Watt does that tell you?

I noticed this while reading another post in which Watts insults John Cook from the excellent blog, Skeptical Science (there is a link, incorrectly attributing the material above to New Scientist). Watt’s quotes this passage from Sourcewatch:

John Cook, on his website Skeptical Science, states that โ€œthe usual suspects in natural climate change โ€“ solar variations, volcanoes, Milankovitch cycles โ€“ are all conspicuous in their absence over the past three decades ofย warming.

โ€ฆ and then he goes on to provide three links (1, 2, 3) that purport counter Cook’sย position.

Well, the whole post is dumb. Cook isn’t saying that there were NO ocean oscillations, volcano effects or Milankovitch cycles in the last 30 years. It seems clear that he was saying that global temperatures have been rising regardless that these influences have been absent, irrelevant or (in the case of volcanoes) acting to counteractย warming.

Beyond being obtuse, Watts also has a little hissy about Cook using the โ€œugly word ‘denier’โ€ in reference to people who, uh, manipulate or misrepresent scientific information to suggest that climate change is not happening, is natural or is nothing to worryย about.

Watts the deal, Tony? Got a guilty conscience?

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

Importing fracked gas during a trade war undermines Canadaโ€™s energy security, environmentalists warn premier.

Importing fracked gas during a trade war undermines Canadaโ€™s energy security, environmentalists warn premier.
on

The multi-millionaire Brexit funder has claimed โ€œCO2 and climate change is the ultimate hoaxโ€.

The multi-millionaire Brexit funder has claimed โ€œCO2 and climate change is the ultimate hoaxโ€.
on

The appointment of Filip Turek to a new rapporteur position is a โ€œdisasterโ€ for the integrity of EU climate policy, say campaigners.

The appointment of Filip Turek to a new rapporteur position is a โ€œdisasterโ€ for the integrity of EU climate policy, say campaigners.
on

On stage at a PragerU fundraiser, the Alberta premier, under fire for allegedly encouraging U.S. leaders to influence Canadian politics, said 'I come in peace'.

On stage at a PragerU fundraiser, the Alberta premier, under fire for allegedly encouraging U.S. leaders to influence Canadian politics, said 'I come in peace'.