Koch Industries' Extensive Funding of Climate Denial Industry Unmasked

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
on

Koch Industries has โ€œbecome a financial kingpin of climate science denial and clean energy opposition,โ€ spending over $48.5 million since 1997 to fund the climate denial machine, according to an extensive report today by Greenpeace.ย 

The Greenpeace report reveals how Koch Industries and the foundations under its control spent far more than even ExxonMobil in recent years to fund industry front groups opposed to clean energy and climate policies.ย  Koch spent over half the total amount -nearly $25 million – funding climate denier groups from 2005 to 2008, a period in which Exxon only spent $8.9 million.

Greenpeaceโ€™s attempt to lift the veil of secrecy inherent to a private company like Koch Industries is no easy task.ย  Because it remains privately owned, Koch faces few of the disclosure requirements designed to increase transparency among publicly-traded companies.

That intentional secrecy allows Koch Industries, the second-largest privately-held company in the United States, to fly largely below the publicโ€™s radar.ย  Few Americans have likely heard of Koch, even though it operates crude oil refineries and pipelines across North America and owns such well-known consumer brands as Dixie cups, Brawny and Quilted Northern paper products, Stainmaster carpet, CoolMax and Lycra.

The companyโ€™s founder, Fred Koch, who once earned $5 million building oil refineries in the Soviet Union during Joseph Stalinโ€™s reign, was a co-founder of the libertarian John Birch Society.ย ย  Charles G. and David H. Koch, two of Fredโ€™s four sons, each now own 42% of the companyโ€™s stock.ย  According to 2009 Forbes rankings, the Koch brothers are tied for the 19th richest person in the world, and for ninth richest American, each worth between $14 and $16 billion, more than George Soros or the founders of Google.

The Koch brothers use three foundations to spread Koch Industriesโ€™ influence, including support for roughly 40 organizations that doubt or downplay climate change or otherwise oppose policy solutions to build a clean energy future.ย  Greenpeace also notes that Koch Industries has been the largest oil and gas industry contributor to electoral campaigns since the 2006 election cycle, and its done its fair share of lobbying as well.ย  During the 2008 elections, Koch Industries contributed over $1.8 million, 88% to Republican candidates. Kochโ€™s political action committee (PAC) also spent more than $2.5 million on contributions to federal candidates for that period, more than any other oil-and-gas sector PAC.

Koch Industries has bankrolled Americans for Prosperity to the tune of over $5 million since 2005.ย  AFP โ€“ known primarily for its role in organizing the tea party movement in the U.S. โ€“ brought notorious climate denier Lord Christopher Monckton to the Copenhagen climate summit as its guest speaker.ย  Despite Lord Moncktonโ€™s reprehensible behavior in Copenhagen โ€“ where he repeatedly compared college students advocating for a clean energy future to โ€œHitler Youthโ€ and โ€œNazisโ€ โ€“ Americans for Prosperity continues to host Monckton at its events in the United States, including a recent appearance in Wisconsin.ย 

While in Wisconsin on AFPโ€™s dime, Monckton booked a side gig at a GOP fundraiser where he described President Barack Obama as a โ€œmonster.โ€ย  I wonder if David Koch โ€“ the second richest man in New York behind Michael Bloomberg – is even aware that Kochโ€™s funding of AFP is in part providing support for Monckton to run around the world labeling American college students โ€œHitler Youthโ€ and calling the President of the United States a โ€œmonsterโ€?

Koch was also one of the funders of the 2007 polar bear junk science โ€œstudyโ€ authored by prominent climate deniers (including Sallie Baliunas, David Legates and Tim Ball) that claimed to prove that polar bear populations were not affected by anthropogenic climate disruption in the Arctic.ย  Dr. Willie Soon, one of the non-peer-reviewed paperโ€™s authors, disclosed in the acknowledgements section that he had received direct corporate funding for the work, stating โ€œW. Soonโ€™s effort for the completion of this paper was partially supported by grants from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, American Petroleum Institute, and Exxon-Mobil Corporation.โ€

Although the paper was thoroughly debunked by actual experts on Arctic sea ice and polar bears, many of the front groups funded by Koch and Exxon rebroadcast the study widely, creating public confusion.ย  The matter came to a head when Sarah Palin and her officers in the Alaskan government referenced the Soon/Baliunas polar bear paper before it was even published in Alaskaโ€™s formal protest of efforts to protect the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.ย  Both Soon and Baliunas have served as spokespeople, advisors and/or board members of multiple Koch-funded climate denial groups over the past decade.

The Greenpeace report notes Kochโ€™s role in funding the Institute for Energy Research, which was behind the Danish study that attacked the viability of wind power.ย  Greenpeace also points out the role that Kochโ€™s web of climate denier groups played in supporting, disseminating and promoting the Spanish study attacking green jobs, including AFP, IER and the Heritage Foundation.

Greenpeace has helped to shed some much-needed light on Koch Industries with this report, providing several case studies, a detailed look at lobbying and campaign expenditures, and other little known facts about the Koch Brothersโ€™ web of front groups.ย 

If you thought you knew everything about anti-science front groups from hearing about ExxonMobilโ€™s efforts over the years, think again.ย  This expose of Koch Industries serves up a heaping pile of unsavory evidence that the climate denial industry is alive and well-funded, even with the scaling back of ExxonMobilโ€™s support.

More attention needs to be paid to Koch Industries, and this report will hopefully encourage deeper investigation into the Koch webโ€™s confusionย campaign.

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a freelance writer and researcher specializing in media, politics, climate change and energy. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, Grist, The Washington Times and other outlets.

Related Posts

on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.
on

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€