It Takes More than Dead Trees to Make a Credible Newspaper

on

An article in last week’s British paper, The Telegraph, claimed that the IPCC had made yet another significant mistake – this time overstating the sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest to drought.  It turns out that the article severely misrepresented the state of the science. While that one very dry year did not produce the kind of vegetation changes detectible by satellite imagery, it did, in fact, kill a number of trees, turning the rainforest from a “sink” that absorbed 2 billion tons of CO2, to a “source” of even more CO2 from the resulting number of dead trees. The culpa for an initial post to Desmogblog, taking the IPCC to task, is exclusively mea.  The correct narrative of the rainforest’s vulnerability to severe drought comes courtesy of the scientists at Realclimate.

Related Posts

on
The former Hungarian PM’s “propaganda machine” has returned with “a new look”, says Greens MEP Daniel Freund.
on
Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne aren’t the party’s only big money backers.
Analysis
on
Financiers with short-term incentives can profit big even if the west coast pipeline pushed by Mark Carney and Alberta costs taxpayers billions.
on
The Ferguson Group is one among dozens of companies working both sides of the climate crisis, according to research by campaigners.