Canadian Taxpayer Federation on Warming: "Nothing to See Here, Move Along."

picture-431-1407968445.jpg
on

If youโ€™re one of the 65,000-odd supporters of The Canadian Taxpayer Federation, your dollars are fighting government waste and improving public accountability. Good forย you!

But youโ€™re also underwriting climate denial.

DeSmogBlog obtained a recent letter sent by Maureen Bader, the groupโ€™s B.C. director (shown here), to a former member who was concerned about the Federationโ€™s position on climate change.ย  In the letter, she characterizes the so-far limited government efforts to address global warming as a โ€œtax grab.โ€ She also calls the U.S. effort to develop a cap-and-trade system โ€œa blatant effort to erect non-tariff barriers to trade.โ€

Governments, both provincially and federally use conventional wisdom, so-called consensus and even stoop to fear as an excuse to raise taxes.ย  They are using peopleโ€™s legitimate concern about the environment as an excuse for a tax grab.

Bader turns to the usual denier playbook: science cherry-picking, pulling data out of context and twisting peer-reviewed science to claim, as she does, that โ€œThere is no consensus that man-made CO2 causes global warming.โ€ Right, except for the 800+ contributing authors and more 450+ lead authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climateย Change.

Later in the letter, Bader โ€“ a former employee of the public affairs bureau of the B.C. Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources โ€“ shares this bit of tortured logic:

For taxpayers, the globe is cooling while CO2 concentration continues to rise, so every penny of taxpayersโ€™ money spent on reducing CO2 is wasted but if the money had been spent on health care instead, everyone would be far better off and in a better position to adapt to whatever change the future will bring.

While Bader sings โ€œQue Sera Sera,โ€ the World Health Organization estimates 150,000 deaths now occur in low-income countries each year due to climate change from four climate-sensitive health outcomes โ€“ crop failure and malnutrition, diarrhoeal disease, malaria and flooding. Almost 85% of these excess deaths are in youngย children.

Her comments on global warming and public health are not only naive, theyโ€™re morally abhorrent. The Federationโ€™s members should takeย note.

Whenever something like this surfaces, we like to follow the money. The Federation doesnโ€™t release financial statements, and reveals little of its funding except to say that it is member-supported. Meanwhile, according to federal public records, the following individuals are listed asย directors.

Peter Green
Michael R. Binnion
Jim Silye
Norm Reise
Aady Crooks
Johnย Mortimer

So itโ€™s everybody-in-the-pool time, DeSmogBlog readers. Can anyone out there tell us a little bit more about these gentlemen? Weโ€™ll update this post as information comesย in.

picture-431-1407968445.jpg
I work with Clean Energy Canada at Tides Canada to help accelerate Canadaโ€™s transition to an energy-efficient, ecologically responsible, and prosperous low-carbonย economy.

Related Posts

on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.