Fred Singer, lacking nobility, still claims the Prize

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
on

Climate skeptics are, not surprisingly, hitting the European speaking circuit in the weeks leading up to the U.N. climate summit in Copenhagen. But what is surprising is that notorious global warming denier S. Fred Singer was described at a skeptic conference today as a Nobel prize winner, a flat out lie.

According to a Belgian journalist who alerted DeSmog to Singerโ€™s appearance today at a skeptic conference in the European Parliament building, Singer was described in event materialsย as:

โ€œa reviewer of IPCC reports, he shares the 2007 Nobel peace prize with Al Gore and 2000 others.โ€

The idea that Fred Singer shares any part in the IPCC/Gore Nobel prize is laughable, of course.ย  Other than Mr. Gore, the Nobel committee recognized only the IPCC authors, and they all received framed Nobel certificates.ย  If Singer can produce a framed Nobel, Iโ€™ll produce my Olympic gold medal (Singer must eat cereal too, I sure enjoy the prizes inside, although I’ve never seen a Nobel peace prize before).

None of the countless reviewers of the IPCC reports (DeSmogBlogโ€™s own Kevin Grandia included) can claim any part of the Nobel glory. But that hasnโ€™t stopped Fred Singer from trying to elevate his role as a reviewer to Nobel status.

Singer now โ€œshares the 2007 Nobel peace prize with Al Gore,โ€ according to materials announcing his keynote speech at todayโ€™s one day conference โ€œHave Humans Changed the Climate?,โ€ hosted by Roger Helmer, a British conservative member of the European Parliament. To be clear, this event isnโ€™t endorsed by the entire European Parliament. Helmer just booked a room inside the building, no doubt hoping to add legitimacy to this leg of the Denial-a-Palooza โ€™09 tour, European edition.ย 

Other โ€œdistinguishedโ€ guest speakers at todayโ€™s skeptic parade include Ross McKitrick (of hockey stick denial fame), University of Oslo Professor Tom Segalstad (also a guest speaker at Heartland Institute’s skeptic conference), and James Delingpole from the Daily Telegraph (UK author who says he’ll โ€œprovide comedy valueโ€ at the conference).

Delinpole describes himself on his website as โ€œa libertarian conservative who writes brilliant books and brilliant articles, and is really great on TV, radio and the internet too.โ€

Enticed by such an amazing self-description, I wandered inside his website to take a look around. I didnโ€™t have to look too far before being completely impressed. After all, front and center of his own homepage today, Delingpole acknowledges what we at DeSmogBlog have known forย years:

We climate change sceptics would have lost the battle long ago had it not been for the happy advent of the internet. Itโ€™s in the Blogosphere (and a few odd MSM strongholds such as The Wall Street Journal and Christopher Bookerโ€™s Sunday Telegraph column) where all the counterarguments are being disseminated.

Mr. Delingpole, thank you for admitting openly that skeptics like Fred Singer and yourself would be out of a job if you all had to rely on trying to get your non-scientific views published in actual peer-reviewed science journals. Please let Fred Singer know this when you see him next.

My work here isย done.

Have you heard S. Fred Singer described elsewhere as a โ€œNobel prize winner?โ€ Drop us an email atย [email protected].

Brendan DeMelle DeSmog
Brendan is Executive Director of DeSmog. He is also a freelance writer and researcher specializing in media, politics, climate change and energy. His work has appeared in Vanity Fair, The Huffington Post, Grist, The Washington Times and other outlets.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.
on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.
Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.