Art appraiser puts principle ahead of profit

authordefault
on

Bostonian rebuffs denier darling Richardย Lindzen

A Boston art dealer sacrificed an easy buck recently in a principled protest against the writings of the climate change denier-darling Dr. Richard Lindzen, according to an outraged story by the junk scientist and cigarette salesman, Steveย Milloy.

Prof. Lindzen (inset) is a senior scientist at MIT, a man who has had an impressive scientific career, but who for the past decade has made himself famous and much-loved in the climate change denial community by quibbling about narrow aspects of climate change science.

Apparently, the professor suffered a recent house fire, resulting in damage to a valuable old rug. When Lindzen tried to get the damage appraised (Milloy reports), a respected Boston art appraiser rejected the opportunity with thisย comment:

I am sorry to inform you that after some consideration, Iโ€™ve decided not to perform the appraisal service that youโ€™ve requested. Your writing on the subject of global warming is offensive to me personally, and I feel that I would have difficulty being an impartial appraiser of value given my view on theย subject.

You have to admire someone who honors his principles ahead of the opportunity to make easy money. And itโ€™s hardly a surprise that Steve Milloy doesnโ€™t understand the dealerโ€™s objection or his honorableย response.

I only wish he had named the upright entrepreneur: we donโ€™t know that many Boston art collectors, but if we find any, weโ€™d love to send him theย business.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.
on

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.
on

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.
on

Campaigners say advertising and PR agencies are โ€œnowhere closeโ€ to giving up their oil and gas clients.

Campaigners say advertising and PR agencies are โ€œnowhere closeโ€ to giving up their oil and gas clients.