New Fraser Institute video both patronizing and wrong

authordefault
on

In an embarrassing – and failed – effort to speak the hip language of youth, the Fraser Institute has launched a YouTube video dismissing climate change as a matter of natural variability,ย saying:

โ€œThe climate changes naturally; always has; alwaysย will.โ€

Obviously aimed at high school students (sample voiceover: โ€œall because you ride the bus to school every dayโ€), this seems to steal from the tobacco makerโ€™s playbook for selling cigarettes to children.

There are so many offensive and incorrect elements in this two-minute video, itโ€™s hard to know where to begin. But how about this: having set up the concern about climate change, the overwrought announcer says, โ€œIn medieval times it was 10 degrees warmer than today.โ€ This is somewhere between a clumsy misrepresentation of cherry-picked data and a barefacedย lie.

For evidence, I recommend the graph on Page 37 of the Fraser Instituteโ€™s own Independent Summary for Policymakers,ย which was itself a thinly disguised, corporate-funded attack on the Nobel-prize winning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change.

The really creepy aspect of the video, however, is the effort to use the kind of language that a bunch of 60-somethings at the Fraser Institute imagine sounds youthful. Itโ€™s patronizing at the least and in incredibly bad taste at the worst. (Whose idea was it to put the quote, โ€œGet the @#$% outta here!โ€ in the mouth of the only black person featured in theย video?)

The Fraser Institute has humiliated itself in the past, taking money from Exxon Mobil and then supporting climate change denial efforts like the Independent Summary. But the organization deserves no credibility whatever – on any issue – if this is representative of the quality of work coming from this particular โ€œthinkโ€ย tank.

PS

If you have a little time, read through the highlighted comments in the Independent Summary. This version is annotated by the good folks – and credible scientists – at RealClimate.org, led on this occasion by University of Chicago computational ocean chemist David Archer. His analysis will give you one more nail that can be used for the coffin holding the Fraser Instituteโ€™sย credibility.

Related Posts

on

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.
on

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.
on

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.
on

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.