Scientists losing war of words over climate change

authordefault
on

In the conservative world of science, conclusions are couched in caveats and statements are chosen carefully to not seem overwrought. And in the world of climate science thatโ€™s no different. For example, in their 2007 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a series of defined levels of certainty about their conclusions that looked likeย this:

โ€ข โ€œVirtually certainโ€ (considered more than 99% likely to beย correct)

โ€ข โ€œVery likelyโ€ (more thanย 90%)

โ€ข โ€œLikelyโ€ (more thanย 66%)

โ€ข โ€œMore likely than notโ€ (more thanย 50%)

โ€ข โ€œUnlikelyโ€ (less thanย 33%)

โ€ข โ€œVery unlikelyโ€ (less thanย 10%)

โ€ข โ€œExceptionally unlikelyโ€ (less thanย 5%)

So in the IPCCโ€™s final report they made statements like, โ€œGlobal climate change is โ€œvery likelyโ€ to have a humanย cause.โ€

According to a recent article in New Scientist this use of language may be one of the reasons the public is not sharing the same level of urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that scientistsย have:

David Budescu of the psychology department at Fordham University in New York and colleagues asked 223 volunteers to read sentences from the IPCC reports that used these expressions. For example: โ€œIt is very likely that hot extremes, heat waves and heavy precipitation events will continue to become moreย frequent.โ€

They then asked participants to estimate on a scale of 0 to 1 the probability conveyed by eachย sentence.

Participants tended to underestimate the certainty of the sentences. Three quarters of respondents thought โ€œvery likelyโ€ meant less than 90% certain, and nearly half thought โ€œvery likelyโ€ meant less than 66% certain. Public understanding of climate change was slightly better if the readers were given a legend to referย to.


This month weโ€™re giving away FREE copies Nobel Laureate Dr. Andrew Weaverโ€™s new book Keeping Our Cool: Canada in a Warmingย World.

Go here to find out more details about DeSmogBlogโ€™s monthly bookย give-away.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.

Decision a blow to campaigners, who say the ads gave Saudi Aramco unearned climate credibility.
on

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.

UKโ€™s first parliamentary debate on the issue drew comparisons both with tobacco industry tactics and the industry's now widely accepted ad ban.
on

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.

Labour's Jacob Collier warns parliamentary debate of "coordinated strategy" by oil companies to delay climate action.
on

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.

Critics fear that Equinorโ€™s latest UK education deal is aimed at quelling opposition to North Sea drilling.