Is it Global Warming or Climate Change?

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
on

Is it more appropriate to use the term โ€œglobal warmingโ€ or โ€œclimateย changeโ€?

Of course, like anything, itโ€™s complicated. For a bit of history lesson on the terms there is a great post on the NASA Global Climate Chageย blog.

To break their very detailed explanation down aย little:

1970: referred to as โ€œinadvertent climateย modification.โ€

UPDATE: an astute reader just pointed out that the term โ€œglobal warmingโ€ was actually used first in a 1973 movie called Soylentย Green.

1975: the first reference to the term โ€œglobal warming.โ€ A 1975 article by by geochemist Wallace Broecker appeared in the journal Science titled: โ€œClimatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Globalย Warming?โ€

1979: a National Academy of Science study abandons the use of the term โ€œinadvertent climateย modification.โ€

1980โ€™s: the term โ€œglobal changeโ€ began to beย used.ย 

1988: โ€œglobal warmingโ€ is popularized by NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen. According to NASA, it was the highly publicized Congressional testimony of Dr. James Hansen in 1988 in which he stated that, โ€œโ€global warming has reached a level such that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship between the greenhouse effect and the observed warming,โ€ that saw the term โ€œglobal warmingโ€ become a popular reference in the mainstreamย media.

Today most scientists use the term โ€œglobal warmingโ€ when referring to surface temperature increases, while โ€œclimate changeโ€ is is used when referring to everything else that contrinutes to the increases in greenhouse gas emissions and all otherย effects.

So there youย go.

While these are the technical uses of the terms there is an argument made that โ€œglobal warmingโ€ should be used instead of โ€œclimate changeโ€ when writing in the popular media, especially online. This is because the term โ€œglobal warmingโ€ is searched out on Google millions times more a month than the term โ€œclimate change.โ€ The argument goes, if you want to increase the number of people reading your material you should use the lexicon that will most increase your chances of appearing in the searchย engines.

For example, hereโ€™s a screenshot from Google trends showing the search volume for the term โ€œglobal warmingโ€ compared to โ€œclimate changeโ€ sinceย 2003:

global-warming-versus-climate-change

(Click toย enlarge)

So the question is: When writing or commenting online do you use the technically correct term or the one that will likely garner you the most visits? Ask a public opinion researcher and theyโ€™ll say use โ€œglobal warmingโ€ all the time. Ask a scientist or policy wonk and theyโ€™ll no doubt recommend the appropriate technicalย use.

I tend towards using the term global warming. But I am torn between being technically correct and getting the most eye-balls on aย story.

So what do you think the answerย is?


This month weโ€™re giving away FREE copies Coming Clean: Breaking Americaโ€™s Addiction to Oil andย Coal.

Go here to find out more details about DeSmogBlogโ€™s monthly bookย give-away.

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
Kevin is a contributor and strategic adviser to DeSmog. He runs the digital marketing agency Spake Media House. Named a โ€œGreen Heroโ€ by Rolling Stone Magazine and one of the โ€œTop 50 Tweetersโ€ on climate change and environment issues, Kevin has appeared in major news media outlets around the world for his work on digital campaigning. Kevin has been involved in the public policy arena in both the United States and Canada for more than a decade. For five years he was the managing editor of DeSmogBlog.com. In this role, Kevinโ€™s research into the โ€œclimate denial industryโ€ and the right-wing think tank networks was featured in news media articles around the world. He is most well known for his ground-breaking research into David and Charles Kochโ€™s massive financial investments in the Republican and tea partyย networks. Kevin is the first person to be designated a โ€œCertified Expertโ€ on theย political and community organizing platformย NationBuilder. Prior to DeSmog, Kevin worked in various political and government roles. He was Senior Advisor to the Minister of State for Multiculturalism and a Special Assistant to the Minister of State for Asia Pacific, Foreign Affairs for the Government of Canada. Kevin also worked in various roles in the British Columbia provincial government in the Office of the Premier and the Ministry of Health. In 2008 Kevin co-founded a groundbreaking new online election tool called Vote for Environment which was later nominated for a World Summit Award in recognition of the worldโ€™s best e-Content and innovative ICTย applications. Kevin moved to Washington, DC in 2010 where he worked for two years as the Director of Online Strategy for Greenpeace USA and has since returned to his hometown of Vancouver, Canada.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.
on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.
Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.