Canada to study economic impact of climate change

authordefault
on

Itโ€™s hard to know whether to celebrate or toย weep.

CanWest News Services reporter Mike de Souza has learned that the government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper is calling for a lightning fast (eight-week), bargain basement ($40,000) report on the potential economic impacts of climate change inย Canada.

We certainly laud the Prime Ministerโ€™s sudden interest, but if this is anything more than a public relations exercise designed to lobby the anti-science cohort in his own caucus, it is an affront – so terribly inadequate to the task as to only further humiliate Canada on the internationalย stage.

Stephen Harper, for the record, is the politician who just four years ago was saying that he saw no reason to rush the climate file because, โ€œThe science is stillย evolving.โ€

Asked about the โ€œgreenhouse effectโ€ in 2002, Harper said, โ€œItโ€™s a scientific hypothesis, a controversial one and one that I think there is some preliminary evidence for. โ€ฆ This may be a lot of fun for a few scientific and environmental elites in Ottawa, but ordinary Canadians from coast to coast will not put up with what this (Kyoto accord) will do to their economy and lifestyle, when the benefits areย negligible.โ€

Now, six years after dismissing the issue so glibly, the Prime Minister acknowledges that he really has no idea of the benefits or costs – of climate change or of trying to deal with the issue. Small wonder. Until now, Mr. Harper and his colleagues have concentrated on promoting Canada as an โ€œenergy superpower,โ€ primarily on the strength of the Alberta tar sands, the dirtiest oil currently being exploited anywhere in theย world.

But letโ€™s imagine that this is actually good news- and not merely a cynical and laughably inadequate policy distraction. Letโ€™s imagine that, having ignored or disparaged the much more serious economic review released in 2006 by former World Bank Chief Economist Lord Nicholas Stern, Prime Minister Harper has noticed that the entire world is ahead of Canada on this issue and that he must effect a major and immediate change to the policies (of denial and delay) that he has championed for the lastย decade.

If thatโ€™s what heโ€™s doing – trying to turn around Canadaโ€™s destructive policy juggernaut – then this might be a promising first step. After all, if you look only at the current effects of such things as the mountain pine beetle infestation, it seems unimaginable that the results of such a study – no matter how quickly it is cobbled together – would not support decisive governmentย action.

Of course, it was unimaginable that someone of Prime Minister Harperโ€™s vaunted reputation for intellectual rigor could have kept himself so resolutely in the dark on this issue for so long. And itโ€™s woefully easy to imagine his chosen service provider (say, someone like Robert Mendelsohn from Yale) coming back with a report that suggests climate change will be no bigย deal.

But letโ€™s be optimistic. Letโ€™s celebrate. Letโ€™s hope that Prime Minister Stephen Harper really hopes to get a quick and dirty document that he can use to tell Canadians what he should have been telling them all along: that the cost of acting to prevent calamity will be a fraction of the cost of allowing this unprecedented global crisis to continue to getย worse.

If this turns out to be just another effort to dodge Canadaโ€™s responsibility to take a leadership position on climate change, there will be time enough to weepย later.


This month weโ€™re giving away FREE copies Coming Clean: Breaking Americaโ€™s Addiction to Oil andย Coal.

Go here to find out more details about DeSmogBlogโ€™s monthly bookย give-away.

Related Posts

on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.
on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.