EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Coal, oil and gas have been killing people for centuries. Weโ€™re still paying for it.

Coal, oil and gas have been killing people for centuries. Weโ€™re still paying for it.
on

Unsubstantiated allegations against top climate advocates part of campaign to โ€œdiscredit and defundโ€ civil society actors in EU, says transparency campaigner.

Unsubstantiated allegations against top climate advocates part of campaign to โ€œdiscredit and defundโ€ civil society actors in EU, says transparency campaigner.
Analysis
on

San Francisco-based developers launch publicity drive to soothe local concerns over giant project.

San Francisco-based developers launch publicity drive to soothe local concerns over giant project.
on

Farageโ€™s new directors reflect his anti-science views.

Farageโ€™s new directors reflect his anti-science views.