EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

As hundreds of CO2 storage wells move toward development, the EPA is handing more regulatory authority to states โ€” despite concerns about safety and long-term liability.

As hundreds of CO2 storage wells move toward development, the EPA is handing more regulatory authority to states โ€” despite concerns about safety and long-term liability.
on

Des compagnies pรฉtroliรจres, gaziรจres et certains mรฉdias cherchent ร  ยซ vider de sa substance ยป les restrictions envisagรฉes.

Des compagnies pรฉtroliรจres, gaziรจres et certains mรฉdias cherchent ร  ยซ vider de sa substance ยป les restrictions envisagรฉes.
on

Leaked lobbying records show oil, gas and media companies aim to โ€˜hollow outโ€™ planned restrictions as key consultation takes place.

Leaked lobbying records show oil, gas and media companies aim to โ€˜hollow outโ€™ planned restrictions as key consultation takes place.
on

Thousands of schools closed their doors, and a third of all pupils were recorded absent in Wales as temperatures hit 37ยฐC.

Thousands of schools closed their doors, and a third of all pupils were recorded absent in Wales as temperatures hit 37ยฐC.