EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

The broadcaster has been accused of becoming โ€œReform TVโ€.

The broadcaster has been accused of becoming โ€œReform TVโ€.
on

The New York Times has included dozens of ads pushing looser permitting rules on Americaโ€™s third-most popular podcast since September, analysis finds.

The New York Times has included dozens of ads pushing looser permitting rules on Americaโ€™s third-most popular podcast since September, analysis finds.
on

The stateโ€™s reforms aimed to fix well cleanup, but a DeSmog and Guardian investigation found it will take decades to clear the backlog.

The stateโ€™s reforms aimed to fix well cleanup, but a DeSmog and Guardian investigation found it will take decades to clear the backlog.
on

Welsh Reform labelled a โ€œretirement home for failed Conservativesโ€.

Welsh Reform labelled a โ€œretirement home for failed Conservativesโ€.