EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.
on

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.
on

Critics say that as the climate crisis worsens, Aberdeen Science Centre is sending the wrong message by partnering with the Norwegian oil major.

Critics say that as the climate crisis worsens, Aberdeen Science Centre is sending the wrong message by partnering with the Norwegian oil major.
Analysis
on

Backing massive gas-burning data centres is no way to build a cleaner, more connected electricity system.

Backing massive gas-burning data centres is no way to build a cleaner, more connected electricity system.