EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

Expert warns that would require 200 billion litres of water and explode Canadaโ€™s emissions.

Expert warns that would require 200 billion litres of water and explode Canadaโ€™s emissions.
on

A member of staff at the firm advocated for AI deregulation at the Reform-linked conference.

A member of staff at the firm advocated for AI deregulation at the Reform-linked conference.
Analysis
on

Albertans pay the highest electricity rates in the country and new gas plants for AI data centres could drive costs up further.

Albertans pay the highest electricity rates in the country and new gas plants for AI data centres could drive costs up further.
on

A new report reveals oil and gas companies knew as early as the mid-1970s that methane fueled climate change while launching massive PR campaigns to promote natural gas as clean energy.

A new report reveals oil and gas companies knew as early as the mid-1970s that methane fueled climate change while launching massive PR campaigns to promote natural gas as clean energy.