EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

Israeli private eye Amit Forlit denied appeal in decision that could lead to his facing a maximum of 45 years in prison if found guilty.

Israeli private eye Amit Forlit denied appeal in decision that could lead to his facing a maximum of 45 years in prison if found guilty.
Analysis
on

Canadian politicians and pundits are leveraging Trumpโ€™s war with Iran to expand fossil fuel infrastructure.

Canadian politicians and pundits are leveraging Trumpโ€™s war with Iran to expand fossil fuel infrastructure.
on

Clean Creatives analysis reveals a โ€œcoordinated narrative shiftโ€ by Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, and Chevron.

Clean Creatives analysis reveals a โ€œcoordinated narrative shiftโ€ by Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, and Chevron.
on

Now, parish lawsuits, including one in front of the Supreme Court, could make oil giants pay to restore the stateโ€™s vanishing marshes.

Now, parish lawsuits, including one in front of the Supreme Court, could make oil giants pay to restore the stateโ€™s vanishing marshes.