EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

DeSmog investigation shows developersโ€™ push to influence local officials to approve data center mega-project.

DeSmog investigation shows developersโ€™ push to influence local officials to approve data center mega-project.
on

The key facts about one of Nigel Farageโ€™s closest allies.

The key facts about one of Nigel Farageโ€™s closest allies.
Analysis
on

Itโ€™s a massive subsidy to Equinor, the Norwegian oil company behind the Bay du Nord offshore oil project.

Itโ€™s a massive subsidy to Equinor, the Norwegian oil company behind the Bay du Nord offshore oil project.
on

A new childrenโ€™s book by a Chevron-backed clean energy venture paints a sympathetic portrait of coal, oil, and gas.

A new childrenโ€™s book by a Chevron-backed clean energy venture paints a sympathetic portrait of coal, oil, and gas.