EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruled  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Air Act.


Related Posts

Analysis
on
Financiers with short-term incentives can profit big even if the west coast pipeline pushed by Mark Carney and Alberta costs taxpayers billions.
on
The Ferguson Group is one among dozens of companies working both sides of the climate crisis, according to research by campaigners.
on
The Free Cities Foundation promotes free-market projects backed by Peter Thiel, Sam Altman, and Marc Andreessen.
on
The group claimed victory after regulators recommended delaying landmark rules that would eventually phase out gas water heaters in 2.8 million homes.