EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

From the One Big Beautiful Bill to a pipeline โ€œloophole,โ€ a new report highlights industry influence on EPA and Congress to reverse climate rules.

From the One Big Beautiful Bill to a pipeline โ€œloophole,โ€ a new report highlights industry influence on EPA and Congress to reverse climate rules.
Series: MAGA
Analysis
on

Black & Veatch, the company behind Goldfinch Technology Park, donates to Republican politicians through its political action committee.

Black & Veatch, the company behind Goldfinch Technology Park, donates to Republican politicians through its political action committee.
on

Oil Sands Alliance's Kendall Dilling confirms that the proposed carbon capture project is more scaled back than oil producers originally advertised.

Oil Sands Alliance's Kendall Dilling confirms that the proposed carbon capture project is more scaled back than oil producers originally advertised.
on

The Gulf petrostate is forging alliances with radical right-wing parties across the world.

The Gulf petrostate is forging alliances with radical right-wing parties across the world.