EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

A string of inauthentic accounts compare clean heating technology to a โ€œlawn mower that never stopsโ€ and depict installers as โ€œenvironmental fraudstersโ€ and โ€œswindlersโ€.

A string of inauthentic accounts compare clean heating technology to a โ€œlawn mower that never stopsโ€ and depict installers as โ€œenvironmental fraudstersโ€ and โ€œswindlersโ€.
on

The Reform leader said his candidates are being racially abused on X, yet his MPs have made big sums from the site.

The Reform leader said his candidates are being racially abused on X, yet his MPs have made big sums from the site.
on

Live tracker of the Reform leaderโ€™s personal income.

Live tracker of the Reform leaderโ€™s personal income.
on

A-third of the Reform leaderโ€™s income has come from overseas interests since he became an MP.

A-third of the Reform leaderโ€™s income has come from overseas interests since he became an MP.