EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

Analysis
on

With Meta's new Manhattan-sized project slated for the state, lawmakers are pushing new restrictions on artificial intelligence even as the Trump administration threatens to withhold broadband funding in response.

With Meta's new Manhattan-sized project slated for the state, lawmakers are pushing new restrictions on artificial intelligence even as the Trump administration threatens to withhold broadband funding in response.

Campaigners say the CAP system favours large landowners and is โ€œfuelling autocratic regimesโ€.

Campaigners say the CAP system favours large landowners and is โ€œfuelling autocratic regimesโ€.
on

The Green Party has accused Farage of being โ€œfocused on personal gain and public divisionโ€.

The Green Party has accused Farage of being โ€œfocused on personal gain and public divisionโ€.
Analysis
on

Is the mask finally coming off the long-delayed Pathways Alliance CCS Project?

Is the mask finally coming off the long-delayed Pathways Alliance CCS Project?