EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

Campaigners say itโ€™s โ€œdeeply concerningโ€ that a major British bank and former COP sponsor is supporting UK coal.

Campaigners say itโ€™s โ€œdeeply concerningโ€ that a major British bank and former COP sponsor is supporting UK coal.

Incoming government is spotlighting highly polluting intensive farming practices, which damage water, land and air.

Incoming government is spotlighting highly polluting intensive farming practices, which damage water, land and air.
on

The oil major has provided a significant chunk of the foundationโ€™s income.

The oil major has provided a significant chunk of the foundationโ€™s income.
on

Boosting energy production is one of the top โ€˜public policy benefits to Canadaโ€™ of data centres, internal Privy Council document explains.

Boosting energy production is one of the top โ€˜public policy benefits to Canadaโ€™ of data centres, internal Privy Council document explains.