EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

SLICK is a funny yet cutting satire of how the ad industry contributes to the climate crisis.

SLICK is a funny yet cutting satire of how the ad industry contributes to the climate crisis.
Analysis
on

DeSmog analysis finds less than one third of planned projects could have full Canadian control over data.

DeSmog analysis finds less than one third of planned projects could have full Canadian control over data.
on

As hundreds of CO2 storage wells move toward development, the EPA is handing more regulatory authority to states โ€” despite concerns about safety and long-term liability.

As hundreds of CO2 storage wells move toward development, the EPA is handing more regulatory authority to states โ€” despite concerns about safety and long-term liability.
on

Des compagnies pรฉtroliรจres, gaziรจres et certains mรฉdias cherchent ร  ยซ vider de sa substance ยป les restrictions envisagรฉes.

Des compagnies pรฉtroliรจres, gaziรจres et certains mรฉdias cherchent ร  ยซ vider de sa substance ยป les restrictions envisagรฉes.