EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

Residents, activists, and a state commissioner critiqued the deals, approved under the top oil regulator, who is stepping down following a DeSmog investigation.

Residents, activists, and a state commissioner critiqued the deals, approved under the top oil regulator, who is stepping down following a DeSmog investigation.
on

The Reform leader is set to trigger a by-election in his seat.

The Reform leader is set to trigger a by-election in his seat.
on

The GB News co-ownerโ€™s hedge fund has multiplied its oil and gas holdings.

The GB News co-ownerโ€™s hedge fund has multiplied its oil and gas holdings.
Analysis
on

Investor call transcripts show that gas companies see the data centre build-out as their next growth sector, even as the energy transition accelerates.

Investor call transcripts show that gas companies see the data centre build-out as their next growth sector, even as the energy transition accelerates.