EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

Emails from the hand-picked, secretive group of climate crisis deniers revealed flaws in their methods and โ€œanimusโ€ toward leading scientists.

Emails from the hand-picked, secretive group of climate crisis deniers revealed flaws in their methods and โ€œanimusโ€ toward leading scientists.
Analysis
on

While Michigan lawmakers are taking fossil fuel companies to court for delaying the green transition, the Alberta government is hampering clean energy.

While Michigan lawmakers are taking fossil fuel companies to court for delaying the green transition, the Alberta government is hampering clean energy.
on

A former Trump official was allowed to peddle climate myths on the Today programme.

A former Trump official was allowed to peddle climate myths on the Today programme.
on

โ€œAnti-eliteโ€ GB News presenter standing in Gorton and Denton has ties to powerful anti-climate groups allied to Donald Trump.

โ€œAnti-eliteโ€ GB News presenter standing in Gorton and Denton has ties to powerful anti-climate groups allied to Donald Trump.