EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruled  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Air Act.


Related Posts

on
Critics say the firm’s deployment of unproven carbon capture technology risks contributing to a gas-powered AI boom.
on
The former Hungarian PM’s “propaganda machine” has returned with “a new look”, says Greens MEP Daniel Freund.
on
Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne aren’t the party’s only big money backers.
Analysis
on
Financiers with short-term incentives can profit big even if the west coast pipeline pushed by Mark Carney and Alberta costs taxpayers billions.