EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.
on

Parliamentarians are โ€œlending legitimacyโ€ to a โ€œtoxic allianceโ€ of attendees at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship event, campaigners warn.

Parliamentarians are โ€œlending legitimacyโ€ to a โ€œtoxic allianceโ€ of attendees at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship event, campaigners warn.
on

An on-the-ground investigation in Pennsylvania finds unprotected radioactive material next to a popular bike and walking trail.

An on-the-ground investigation in Pennsylvania finds unprotected radioactive material next to a popular bike and walking trail.
on

As fishing communities fight back, Petrobras is going all out to control the narrative, a DeSmog investigation finds.

As fishing communities fight back, Petrobras is going all out to control the narrative, a DeSmog investigation finds.