EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

Analysis
on

Investor call transcripts show that gas companies see the data centre build-out as their next growth sector, even as the energy transition accelerates.

Investor call transcripts show that gas companies see the data centre build-out as their next growth sector, even as the energy transition accelerates.
on

Sign up for our July 8 virtual conversation on combatting fossil fuels and fascism, keeping up with climate denial, and solving polluted information ecosystems.

Sign up for our July 8 virtual conversation on combatting fossil fuels and fascism, keeping up with climate denial, and solving polluted information ecosystems.
on

More farmed salmon will not necessarily bring better food security, say researchers.

More farmed salmon will not necessarily bring better food security, say researchers.
on

Clare Carlile's reporting was recognized under the โ€˜News Item of the Yearโ€™ award for revealing how UK government staffing shortages would harm the environment during a historic drought.

Clare Carlile's reporting was recognized under the โ€˜News Item of the Yearโ€™ award for revealing how UK government staffing shortages would harm the environment during a historic drought.