EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

The longtime Big Oil attorney has major ties to conservative legal groups.

The longtime Big Oil attorney has major ties to conservative legal groups.
Series: MAGA
on

CPAC GB partners with Bitcoin network as Reform leader comes under fire for industry connections.

CPAC GB partners with Bitcoin network as Reform leader comes under fire for industry connections.
on

More than a decade after Shell announced its Beaver County complex, new reports show the oil giantโ€™s promised economic revival failed, while pollution concerns now shape debates over proposed data centers.

More than a decade after Shell announced its Beaver County complex, new reports show the oil giantโ€™s promised economic revival failed, while pollution concerns now shape debates over proposed data centers.
on

Nearly two thirds of countryโ€™s pig and poultry farms leach polluting manure into lough that supplies half the region's drinking water, according to latest research.

Nearly two thirds of countryโ€™s pig and poultry farms leach polluting manure into lough that supplies half the region's drinking water, according to latest research.