Oreskes Chronicles Birth of Climate Change Denial

authordefault
on

Naomi Oreskes, the science historian whose landmark article 2004 Science article, finally put the lie as to whether there was a legitimate climate change โ€œdebate,โ€ has written a new piece for the TimesOnline, describing on of the best early warnings the U.S. received about global warming, and revealing the efforts of scientist-turned-lobbyist Bill Nierenberg in beginning to sowย confusion.

As Oreskes reports, the U.S. government had solid information on the likelihood (and potential severity) of climate change in 1979 – delivered by a panel of some of the most impressive scientists in the land. But In 1980, then-President Ronald Reagan found the truth inconvenient. If the world community started worrying about climate change, Reagan figured everyone would start blaming America (because America was making the biggest contribution). Reagen tapped Nierenberg for an alternative report, and the big lie began. ย 

Related Posts

on

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.

The Reform UK leaderโ€™s planned trip to Washington D.C. has prompted fresh consternation from campaigners.
Series: MAGA
Opinion
on

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.

Policymakers, civil society, investors, business, and the media all must answer key questions fast โ€” before the regulatory rollback turns into a rout.
on

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.

The Alberta gas giant Capital Power lobbied the government 37 times in the lead-up to an accord suspending clean energy regulations, federal records show.
on

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.

Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from considering the petition, despite significant financial conflicts of interest in implicated cases.