Wall Street Journal: Still Promoting Debate

authordefault
onMar 25, 2008 @ 11:40 PDT

Despite having been proved, again and again, to be out of step with the science, the Wall Street Journal is still promoting a phony โ€œbalancedโ€ view on global warming – still trying to argue that there is a legitimate argument about climateย change.

In a short feature today, the WSJ juxtaposes three decades of warnings, from sources of integrity and obvious expertise (eg., the U.S. Department of Energy), with 30 years of denial, from paid apologists for industry (eg., former tobacco and energy industry shill Dr. Fredย Seitz).

The effect is to elevate the status of the deniers and to suggest that debateย endures.

It’s a sham that should be embarrassing to any journalist ofย conscience.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onNov 11, 2025 @ 06:27 PST

Register to watch on-the-ground coverageย from our team at theย COP30 climate talks in Belรฉm, Brazil.

Register to watch on-the-ground coverageย from our team at theย COP30 climate talks in Belรฉm, Brazil.
onNov 10, 2025 @ 13:42 PST

A summit billed as the last chance to revive global climate action faces unprecedented pressure from the food sectorโ€™s largest emitters.

A summit billed as the last chance to revive global climate action faces unprecedented pressure from the food sectorโ€™s largest emitters.

Organisers offered pesticide giants and agribusiness lobby group โ€œvisibilityโ€ and โ€œimage gainโ€ in return for financial contributions to climate summit's Agrizone.

Organisers offered pesticide giants and agribusiness lobby group โ€œvisibilityโ€ and โ€œimage gainโ€ in return for financial contributions to climate summit's Agrizone.
onNov 10, 2025 @ 09:00 PST

The newspaper has been scolding the BBC for its editorial failings, while issuing a string of climate corrections.

The newspaper has been scolding the BBC for its editorial failings, while issuing a string of climate corrections.