Skeptics' Journal Publishes Plagiarist's Paper

authordefault
on

Despite dismissing the work as โ€œa bit patchy and nothing new,โ€ Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, editor of the skepticโ€™s journal Energy and Environment journal, has published the work of the plagiarist Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte.

Dr. Schulteโ€™s โ€œresearchโ€ was first published last year on an industry-funded website called the Science and Public Policy Institute. Actually, it was excerpted in a long essay by the disingenuous Viscount Christopher Monckton (inset), who pronounced Schulteโ€™s paper serious, peer-reviewed science even while failing to admit his own part in its creation.

Following up on criticisms of Schulteโ€™s methodology and accusations that he had plagiarized earlier work by the oft-humiliated anthropologist Benny Peiser, the DeSmogBlog contacted Ms. Boehmer-Christiansen in September and asked how she could justify publishing Schulteโ€™s article.

In her response, dated Sept. 6, 2006, Boehmer-Christiansen said:

For your information, I have informed Dr.Schulte that I am happy to publish his own research findings on the effect on patients of climate alamism/โ€™Angstโ€™.
His survey of papers critical of the consensus was a bit patchy and nothing new, as you point out. it was not what was of interest to me; nothing has been published.
Sincerely
Sonja B-C
And as of September last year, nothing had been published. But the March issue of E&E proudly includes Schulteโ€™s work, pretty much unedited from the much-criticized version circulating last summer. We still await any actual research from Schulte on the effect of โ€œalarmismโ€ or โ€œangstโ€ on the health of his patients โ€“ or anything beyond his anecdotal reports that some among his patients find the threat of climate change (quite justifiably) anxiety inducing.
 
For the definitive review of both Schulteโ€™s unimpressive scholarship and the longer-running campaign to claim a legitimate ongoing scientific debate about global warming, see the attached paper by John R. Mashey. It is exhaustive and devastating โ€“ and pretty much every potential point of contention is backed up with links and direct references, creating a degree of transparency the likes of which appear to be entirely unfamiliar to Monckton-Schulte.
authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

Australiaโ€™s Woodside approves $17.5 billion LNG project just days before Trump social services budget cuts, leaving locals facing โ€œharsh economic reality.โ€

Australiaโ€™s Woodside approves $17.5 billion LNG project just days before Trump social services budget cuts, leaving locals facing โ€œharsh economic reality.โ€
on

Even as the mood at Edmontonโ€™s annual expo turned cautious, industry still bet on public dollars to keep its net zero dream alive.

Even as the mood at Edmontonโ€™s annual expo turned cautious, industry still bet on public dollars to keep its net zero dream alive.
on

The U.S. private equity firm KKR contributed to the presidentโ€™s swearing-in ceremony.

The U.S. private equity firm KKR contributed to the presidentโ€™s swearing-in ceremony.
on

Despite widespread public support for clean energy and climate action, Nigel Farageโ€™s party is running on an aggressively anti-net zero ticket.

Despite widespread public support for clean energy and climate action, Nigel Farageโ€™s party is running on an aggressively anti-net zero ticket.