In response to the Financial Post

authordefault
on

The following letter was sent to the National Post yesterday, Friday, Nov. 24, 2006, a much-edited version ran in the business section today. We reprint the entire letter here for yourย interest.

I must respond to a series of unwarranted attacks by Financial Post Editor Terence Corcoran on me personally and on DeSmogBlog.com that I run, independent of my business (James Hoggan &ย Associates).

I acknowledge, without reservation, that I made an error in a fifth estate television interview broadcast on Nov. 15, 2006. In discussing an anti-climate-change petition submitted in April to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, I overstated how many of the 60 signatories were also involved in the tobacco industryโ€™s well-documented campaign to deny the harmful effects of second-handย smoke.

I recognize that this error may have given offence to the legitimate experts who signed that petition โ€“ people like University of Alberta mathematician Dr. Gordon Swaters (who has said since that he was persuaded to add his name under false pretences). I would like to apologize to those individualsย unreservedly.

I object, however, that Mr. Corcoran is attempting to use this mistake to deny that certain self-proclaimed climate experts are participating in a war on science, trying to confuse the public about climate change. Even the prestigious Royal Society of London has complained to ExxonMobil for paying โ€œexpertsโ€ who deny that climate change is aย problem.

Having worked for 30 years to maintain a high ethical standard, I feel the public has a right to know that a number of industry-funded โ€œexpertsโ€ are not performing science; they are participating in a public relations campaign that brings shame to my chosenย profession.

Thatโ€™s why Iโ€™m speaking out. Thatโ€™s why I started the DeSmogBlog: and will continue to use it to show when the public is being misled. That, finally, is why I object so strenuously to the bias in the pages of the Financialย Post.

Jamesย Hoggan

www.DeSmogBlog.com

Related Posts

on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.
on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.