DeSmog

Facebook-f X-twitter
Subscribe
Donate
Donate

DeSmog

Donate
Search
Search

Correction: We Were Wrong About ExxonProfits

authordefault
By Richard Littlemore
on

How embarrassing: the DeSmogBlog has reported, at least twice, that ExxonMobil posted profits of $9.92 billion in the third quarter this year. That’s incorrect. At least, it’s old news.

The $9.92 figure was last year’s total. Third quarter profits for this year were $10.49 billion. Profit for the first nine months of 2006 totalled $29.25 billion.

The DeSmogBlog would like to apologize to ExxonMobil for any implication that the company is not creaming every last dollar out of the commercial production of greenhouse gases.

By Richard Littlemore

Related Posts

Inside the Grassroots Revolt Against Carbon Capture Pipelines
ByTaylor Noakes
on

Seemingly unlikely alliances are springing up in Canada and the U.S. to prevent rural communities from becoming a โ€˜toxic CO2 dumping groundโ€™.

Seemingly unlikely alliances are springing up in Canada and the U.S. to prevent rural communities from becoming a โ€˜toxic CO2 dumping groundโ€™.
uk/Investigate Reform MP Over Donation, Campaigners Demand
BySam Bright
on

New controversy adds to scrutiny of party's finances.

New controversy adds to scrutiny of party's finances.
Series: Defending Democracy from Dirty Money
Series: Defending-UK-Democracy
Analysis
As Climate-Fuelled Wildfires Rage, Mark Carney Cuts Emergency Response and Funds Fossil Fuels
ByMitch Anderson
on

The prime minister should consider the potential outcomes of siding with his Bay Street buddies and oil industry bigwigs over climate-beleaguered Canadians.

The prime minister should consider the potential outcomes of siding with his Bay Street buddies and oil industry bigwigs over climate-beleaguered Canadians.
uk/The Lovelock Papers: Shellโ€™sย Hiddenย Climate Knowledge Under Scrutiny as Court Battle Looms
ByRebecca John
on

As the company faces a landmark climate lawsuit, confidential documents show how British scientist James Lovelock warned executives of the risks of burning fossil fuels in the 1960s.

As the company faces a landmark climate lawsuit, confidential documents show how British scientist James Lovelock warned executives of the risks of burning fossil fuels in the 1960s.
Series: #ShellKnew
Series: #ShellKnew