Deltoid's Tim Lambert Bursts Peiser's Bubble

authordefault
on

Deltoid blogger Tim Lambert has dealt a decisive (and entertaining) blow against Dr. Benny Peiser, the Liverpool John Moores University anthropologist who had tried to deny the accuracy ofr Naomi Oreskes’ research on climate science in the peer-review literature.

Oreskes had reported in Science magazine that none of the 928 peer-reviewed articles she had found between 1993 and 2003 had disagreed with the consensus that human activity is causing climate change. Peiser took another look at the literature (or said he did) and reported that 34 papers denied or refuted the consensus.

Lambert looked at Peiser’s reporting, demanded a list of the papers and finally established that Peiser could find only one such paper – not peer-reviewed – from the AAPG (American Association of Petroleum Geologists).

Bye bye Benny.

Related Posts

on

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.
on

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.
on

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.
on

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.