Scientific American Slams the Wall Street Journal

authordefault
on

Scientific American just published a somewhat scathing attack on the Wall Street Journal, accusing their editorial board of

hurling editorials of stunning misdirection at their readers, continuing their irresponsible drumbeat that global warming is junk science.

The DeSmogBlog would like to applaud them for their stern telling off of the paper. We couldn’t have done it better ourselves:

The Wall Street Journal editorial page has for years railed against these scientific findings on climate change, even as the global consensus has reached nearly 100 percent of the scientific community.

Amen!

Related Posts

on

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.
on

Parliamentarians are โ€œlending legitimacyโ€ to a โ€œtoxic allianceโ€ of attendees at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship event, campaigners warn.

Parliamentarians are โ€œlending legitimacyโ€ to a โ€œtoxic allianceโ€ of attendees at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship event, campaigners warn.
on

An on-the-ground investigation in Pennsylvania finds unprotected radioactive material next to a popular bike and walking trail.

An on-the-ground investigation in Pennsylvania finds unprotected radioactive material next to a popular bike and walking trail.
on

As fishing communities fight back, Petrobras is going all out to control the narrative, a DeSmog investigation finds.

As fishing communities fight back, Petrobras is going all out to control the narrative, a DeSmog investigation finds.