Scientific American Slams the Wall Street Journal

authordefault
on

Scientific American just published a somewhat scathing attack on the Wall Street Journal, accusing their editorial board of

hurling editorials of stunning misdirection at their readers, continuing their irresponsible drumbeat that global warming is junk science.

The DeSmogBlog would like to applaud them for their stern telling off of the paper. We couldn’t have done it better ourselves:

The Wall Street Journal editorial page has for years railed against these scientific findings on climate change, even as the global consensus has reached nearly 100 percent of the scientific community.

Amen!

Related Posts

on

At the Heartland Instituteโ€™s annual climate conference, fossil fuel allies warn MAHAโ€™s push on regulating chemicals and plastics could threaten the oil industry โ€” exposing a growing rift inside Trumpโ€™s base.

At the Heartland Instituteโ€™s annual climate conference, fossil fuel allies warn MAHAโ€™s push on regulating chemicals and plastics could threaten the oil industry โ€” exposing a growing rift inside Trumpโ€™s base.
on

Experts say mass-produced AI misinformation is the โ€œnew Cambridge Analytica scandalโ€.

Experts say mass-produced AI misinformation is the โ€œnew Cambridge Analytica scandalโ€.
on

The think tank representatives are making variations of a similar argument: Trumpโ€™s illegal military incursions serve as an opportunity for Canada to expand oil and gas infrastructure.

The think tank representatives are making variations of a similar argument: Trumpโ€™s illegal military incursions serve as an opportunity for Canada to expand oil and gas infrastructure.
Analysis
on

Belief in climate change is rising, but action stalls. New research reveals how subtle narratives are slowing policy โ€“ and how to fight back.

Belief in climate change is rising, but action stalls. New research reveals how subtle narratives are slowing policy โ€“ and how to fight back.