Scientific American Slams the Wall Street Journal

authordefault
on

Scientific American just published a somewhat scathing attack on the Wall Street Journal, accusing their editorial board of

hurling editorials of stunning misdirection at their readers, continuing their irresponsible drumbeat that global warming is junk science.

The DeSmogBlog would like to applaud them for their stern telling off of the paper. We couldn’t have done it better ourselves:

The Wall Street Journal editorial page has for years railed against these scientific findings on climate change, even as the global consensus has reached nearly 100 percent of the scientific community.

Amen!

Related Posts

on

Campaigners say itโ€™s โ€œdeeply concerningโ€ that a major British bank and former COP sponsor is supporting UK coal.

Campaigners say itโ€™s โ€œdeeply concerningโ€ that a major British bank and former COP sponsor is supporting UK coal.

Incoming government is spotlighting highly polluting intensive farming practices, which damage water, land and air.

Incoming government is spotlighting highly polluting intensive farming practices, which damage water, land and air.
on

The oil major has provided a significant chunk of the foundationโ€™s income.

The oil major has provided a significant chunk of the foundationโ€™s income.
on

Boosting energy production is one of the top โ€˜public policy benefits to Canadaโ€™ of data centres, internal Privy Council document explains.

Boosting energy production is one of the top โ€˜public policy benefits to Canadaโ€™ of data centres, internal Privy Council document explains.