Friends of Science a Political, NOT Scientific Clique

authordefault
on

Here’s another in the recent Friends of Science (FOS) flurry, a story in the Daily Oil Bulletin (DOB) that (surprise!) takes issue with the science of man-made climateย change.

It raises a series of questions. If FOS cares about science, why does it expend all its energy and a huge anmount of money on politics and publicย relations?

If DOB cares about accuracy or balance, why would it report that 60 scientists signed a letter challenging climate science โ€“ without reporting that a week later, 90 more senior scientists responded with a letter attesting to the reliability of the current scientificย consensus.

Finally, if Dr. Tim Patterson wants to be taken seriously on his theory that sunspots have caused global warming, why is he afraid to share any graph that extends beyond 1980 (when sunspot intensity went one way and climate and temperature wentย another)?

Friends of Conservatives? Clearly. Friends of the oil industry? Absolutely. Friends of Science? Woefully, there is no evidence to suggestย so.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Albertans pay the highest electricity rates in the country and new gas plants for AI data centres could drive costs up further.

Albertans pay the highest electricity rates in the country and new gas plants for AI data centres could drive costs up further.
on

A new report reveals oil and gas companies knew as early as the mid-1970s that methane fueled climate change while launching massive PR campaigns to promote natural gas as clean energy.

A new report reveals oil and gas companies knew as early as the mid-1970s that methane fueled climate change while launching massive PR campaigns to promote natural gas as clean energy.
Opinion
on

The industry has abandoned its climate pledges in favor of fossil fuel-powered AI data centers.

The industry has abandoned its climate pledges in favor of fossil fuel-powered AI data centers.
on

The Reform leader pocketed major sums from second jobs and donor gifts.

The Reform leader pocketed major sums from second jobs and donor gifts.