But What's the Point, Rex?

authordefault
on

Canada’s most loquacious iconoclast, the grandiloquent Rex Murphy, was having forth on CBC’s The National again last night, arguing that Paul Martin’s position on climate change is hypocritical (which is true), and that the whole notion of global warming is too confusing to be believable (which is pathetic).

It is ever a disappointment that, in rustling up his fatuous philippics, Murphy can always find time to commune with his Thesaurus but never manages an opportunity to check his facts.

Five minutes with a Grade 7 science teacher would be sufficient to understand why “warmer can mean wetter.” Three minutes on the Nature website would explain that, in certain global pockets, warmer can indeed mean colder, especially if the Gulf Stream stalls in the Atlantic Ocean.

C’mon Rex. Enough with the Ciceronian silliness, the blithe blather wrapped in lavish language. How about a little reliable content, for a change?

Related Posts

Campaigners say the CAP system favours large landowners and is “fuelling autocratic regimes”.

Campaigners say the CAP system favours large landowners and is “fuelling autocratic regimes”.
on

The Green Party has accused Farage of being “focused on personal gain and public division”.

The Green Party has accused Farage of being “focused on personal gain and public division”.
Analysis
on

Is the mask finally coming off the long-delayed Pathways Alliance CCS Project?

Is the mask finally coming off the long-delayed Pathways Alliance CCS Project?
on

Join a May 7 discussion on how the Trump administration’s open embrace of climate denial in Washington is enabling more denial at the highest levels of government in the U.S. and beyond.

Join a May 7 discussion on how the Trump administration’s open embrace of climate denial in Washington is enabling more denial at the highest levels of government in the U.S. and beyond.