Fall Back: Putting the Lie to Daylight Savings Time

authordefault
onOct 31, 2005 @ 14:40 PST

It appears, alas, that the Bush Administrationโ€™s single effort to address the Climate Change crisis is not just inadequate, but counterproductive. The vague gesture in question is the Bush proposal to extend daylight savings time three weeks later into the winter season, purportedly to shift the daysโ€™ available light toward evening, thereby preservingย energy by reducing the need for electric lightย after school andย work.

But in his new book, Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Savings Time, Tufts University Professor Michael Downing reports that Daylight Savings Time has never actually saved energy. On the contrary, people use more energy in the morning โ€“ getting up and preparing for work/school in the dark โ€“ and more in the evening, because they are much more likely toย drive around to evening functions. Accordingly, the people most in favour of Daylight Savings Time tend to be sports organizations (especially golf courses), department stores (sales go up measurably during DST) and Bigย Energy.

Imagine: Which of those groups might have influence in the White House?ย 

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onNov 28, 2025 @ 03:02 PST

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.

The Labour peer called for new coal power in the Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s annual lecture.
Opinion
onNov 27, 2025 @ 06:38 PST

Blunt communication is our firewall.

Blunt communication is our firewall.
onNov 25, 2025 @ 22:00 PST

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.

The programme is โ€œyet another bung to industrial productionโ€, experts say.
Analysis
onNov 24, 2025 @ 09:00 PST

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.